| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
Wed, 15 December 2004 08:09
 
|
 |
Well considering stock gen 3s run 11psi, i do not consider 3psi difference a worth while result. When you could keep the stock turbos and end up being able to run the same boost. Comon lets be honest, why would you waste all that time and money putting a single turbo on a 1g when you cant even reach higer boost levels than whats attainable on the stock twin setup if thats your reasoning for the single turbo setup.
You would have to forgive me just got home from work before and you would usually get stupid unthought answers like that out of me. Now i have had time to rest the above is the meaning of what i wanted to say before 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
CT26 turbo
|
jcmunga | Tue, 14 December 2004 10:56 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 14 December 2004 11:16 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
MR 1JZ | Wed, 15 December 2004 04:13 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
Fattony | Wed, 15 December 2004 05:57 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
Siktoy ra23 | Wed, 15 December 2004 06:07 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
MR 1JZ | Wed, 15 December 2004 07:12 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
Fattony | Wed, 15 December 2004 08:09 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
MR 1JZ | Wed, 15 December 2004 08:38 |
|
Re: CT26 turbo
|
JustenGT4 | Thu, 16 December 2004 02:56 |
