| Author | Topic |
|---|
Toymods Vice President
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: user classification
|
Thu, 30 December 2004 00:28
 
|
 |
The names in no way convey a level of knowledge. If they are interpretted this way then so be it but I think if a person takes information as fact because the person saying it is a "forum junky" then they will have problems no matter what.
The names are there so that our members can get an indication of their contribution to the comunity. This doesn't mean that they have all been good contributions just that they have made a contribution rather than just lurking and adding nothing to the forum.
I'm not saying lurking is bad, I'd much rather have someone lurk than post useless, or worse incorrect information. I'm just answering your question.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
user classification
|
granmra40 | Wed, 29 December 2004 00:45 |
|
Re: user classification
|
Cool1 | Wed, 29 December 2004 00:50 |
|
Re: user classification
|
Joshstix | Wed, 29 December 2004 01:41 |
|
Re: user classification
|
djcougar | Wed, 29 December 2004 01:51 |
|
Re: user classification
|
granmra40 | Wed, 29 December 2004 23:03 |
|
Re: user classification
|
Joshstix | Thu, 30 December 2004 00:28 |
|
Re: user classification
|
Toobs | Mon, 03 January 2005 05:17 |
|
Re: user classification
|
bathurst-91 | Sat, 05 February 2005 00:10 |
|
Re: user classification
|
CrUZsida | Wed, 09 February 2005 02:53 |
|
Re: user classification
|
djcougar | Wed, 09 February 2005 03:26 |
