| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Montrose, VIC
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
Tue, 04 January 2005 10:49
 
|
 |
I was leaning towards bernoullis theorum, good to know I've got a few other people to blame as well if it doesn't work 
I was using the thermodynamics book simply because I had it handy, leftover from uni. The change in viscosity and density with temperature are being compensated seperately with a temp sensor.
I need to be able to do this simply because with what I'm doing, there are enormous changes in fuel pressure which I can't do anything about. I already have a temp and a pressure sensor in the fuel rail, I'm just trying to make up some tables to shove into the Motec, no doubt they'll need a little tidying up on the dyno later anyway. Thanks guys!
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Flow vs. Pressure
|
mrshin | Mon, 03 January 2005 11:27 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
Ra28Freak | Mon, 03 January 2005 12:57 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
gabe | Mon, 03 January 2005 14:39 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
gabe | Mon, 03 January 2005 15:04 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
MS-75 | Mon, 03 January 2005 20:19 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
Skip | Mon, 03 January 2005 23:55 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
shinybluesteel | Tue, 04 January 2005 00:15 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
Miss MR2 | Tue, 04 January 2005 00:41 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
mrshin | Tue, 04 January 2005 10:49 |
|
Re: Flow vs. Pressure
|
HighRolla | Tue, 04 January 2005 12:03 |
