Author | Topic |

Location: Perth
Registered: May 2004
|
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
Tue, 18 January 2005 10:12

|
 |
OR it could be one of those Celica XX things.
Which i think is essentially the same thing ??
Someone will correct me I am sure if the above statement is incorrect...
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
KE70 | Tue, 18 January 2005 09:49 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
acreese | Tue, 18 January 2005 10:02 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
acreese | Tue, 18 January 2005 10:07 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
acreese | Tue, 18 January 2005 10:12 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
KE70 | Tue, 18 January 2005 10:13 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
KE70 | Tue, 18 January 2005 10:20 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
ra23celica | Tue, 18 January 2005 12:21 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
KE70 | Tue, 18 January 2005 10:02 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
KE70 | Tue, 18 January 2005 10:04 |
 |
Re: Bathurst ST162 Celica
|
ART Racing | Tue, 25 January 2005 12:37 |