| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
May 2003
|
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Sat, 22 January 2005 00:32
 
|
 |
|
both shifters have a little elastomer dampener in the upper part of the shifter. Contained within the bulbous housing. The TRD one is made of a harder rubber than the others and therefore doesnt dampen the vibrations as much.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Big T | Fri, 21 January 2005 08:06 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
ae86drift | Fri, 21 January 2005 08:49 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Mr Revhead | Fri, 21 January 2005 20:25 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
TurboRA28 | Fri, 21 January 2005 21:51 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Mr Revhead | Fri, 21 January 2005 21:55 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
takai | Fri, 21 January 2005 22:45 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Mr Revhead | Fri, 21 January 2005 22:50 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
takai | Sat, 22 January 2005 00:32 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
ae86drift | Sat, 22 January 2005 03:24 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
4agte | Sat, 22 January 2005 04:01 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Big T | Sat, 22 January 2005 04:38 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
takai | Sat, 22 January 2005 06:32 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Bazooka | Mon, 14 March 2005 08:05 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Big T | Mon, 14 March 2005 08:12 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
Alchemist | Mon, 14 March 2005 08:41 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
IRA11Y | Tue, 15 March 2005 04:50 |
|
Re: T3 vs TRD short-shifter for t-50 box?
|
mrshin | Tue, 15 March 2005 05:24 |
