Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane
Registered: February 2003
|
Re: Twin vs single system
|
Tue, 25 January 2005 06:34

|
 |
if anyone recalls the pictures of the new v10 BMW engines recently posted, they might remember that they had the CATs right up close to the engine with the O2 sensors just ahead of them - most efficient place for the CATs to work properly, keeps the heat from under the car (read: SA bushfire), leaves firewall between CATs and cabin rather than thin floorpan.
i'd suggest something like that ... 2 x CATs up close-and-personal with the the ends of the collectors - after them, it's all just noise control.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Twin vs single system
|
Nark | Mon, 24 January 2005 11:42 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
thechuckster | Mon, 24 January 2005 12:30 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
mrshin | Mon, 24 January 2005 12:33 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
towe_001 | Mon, 24 January 2005 13:07 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 24 January 2005 21:35 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
Nark | Tue, 25 January 2005 00:11 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 25 January 2005 00:48 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
FWDCelica | Tue, 25 January 2005 00:58 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 25 January 2005 01:08 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
FWDCelica | Tue, 25 January 2005 01:40 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 25 January 2005 01:42 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
Kyosho | Tue, 25 January 2005 02:44 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
Kyosho | Tue, 25 January 2005 02:42 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 25 January 2005 02:49 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
thechuckster | Tue, 25 January 2005 06:34 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
Nark | Tue, 25 January 2005 07:06 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
Kyosho | Tue, 25 January 2005 07:19 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
towe_001 | Tue, 25 January 2005 18:37 |
 |
Re: Twin vs single system
|
b1gb3n | Tue, 25 January 2005 21:40 |