Author | Topic |

Location: Southern Sydney
Registered: August 2002
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
Thu, 14 November 2002 22:28

|
 |
I agree. GTR's and skylines in general are overated.
1jz's make the same power as an RB26 using less boost. They are a more efficient engine for this very reason.
I'm going to leave it there....
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
mc1j | Thu, 14 November 2002 15:38 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
| Thu, 14 November 2002 21:18 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Thu, 14 November 2002 22:19 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
Remedy | Thu, 14 November 2002 22:28 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
ytri | Thu, 14 November 2002 22:48 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
| Fri, 15 November 2002 00:13 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Fri, 15 November 2002 01:48 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
mc1j | Fri, 15 November 2002 10:21 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Fri, 15 November 2002 23:30 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
frebbles | Sat, 16 November 2002 19:42 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Sun, 17 November 2002 10:56 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
frebbles | Mon, 18 November 2002 10:13 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Mon, 18 November 2002 11:27 |
 |
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
thunderbird1 | Mon, 18 November 2002 14:28 |