| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Preston
Registered:
June 2002
|
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
Thu, 14 November 2002 22:48
 
|
 |
| Quote: |
1jz's make the same power as an RB26 using less boost. They are a more efficient engine for this very reason.
I'm going to leave it there....
|
Not to mention the huge assed intercooler hanging out the front....
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
mc1j | Thu, 14 November 2002 15:38 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
| Thu, 14 November 2002 21:18 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Thu, 14 November 2002 22:19 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
Remedy | Thu, 14 November 2002 22:28 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
ytri | Thu, 14 November 2002 22:48 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
| Fri, 15 November 2002 00:13 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Fri, 15 November 2002 01:48 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
mc1j | Fri, 15 November 2002 10:21 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Fri, 15 November 2002 23:30 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
frebbles | Sat, 16 November 2002 19:42 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Sun, 17 November 2002 10:56 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
frebbles | Mon, 18 November 2002 10:13 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
celicamad | Mon, 18 November 2002 11:27 |
|
Re: 1JZ Turbo Position idea..Better than twin dumps??
|
thunderbird1 | Mon, 18 November 2002 14:28 |
