| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Perth, WA
Registered:
December 2004
|
|
Re: linux distros
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:22
 
|
 |
actually its 76 GB but what the hell, im talking about the n00bies (not that anythings wrong with that)
the capacity of your drive is done using a formula of cylinders, sectors and some other shit..
the manufactures however, instead of having a GB defined as 1024 MB, as it should be, they use 1000 MB, which is why when you get a hard drive, its never at full capacity...
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
linux distros
|
ehendrikd | Tue, 08 February 2005 03:20 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Nark | Tue, 08 February 2005 03:23 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
muzzi | Tue, 08 February 2005 05:08 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Alchemist | Tue, 08 February 2005 11:17 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Nark | Tue, 08 February 2005 12:08 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Alchemist | Tue, 08 February 2005 12:13 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Nark | Tue, 08 February 2005 22:30 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Tue, 08 February 2005 23:16 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
muzzi | Wed, 09 February 2005 00:08 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Nark | Wed, 09 February 2005 01:16 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
muzzi | Wed, 09 February 2005 01:25 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
inertia | Wed, 09 February 2005 01:43 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Dale_ta22 | Wed, 09 February 2005 03:49 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
EldarO | Wed, 09 February 2005 05:24 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
muzzi | Wed, 09 February 2005 05:36 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
EldarO | Wed, 09 February 2005 07:22 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
Nark | Wed, 09 February 2005 07:32 |
|
Re: linux distros
|
jackel | Wed, 09 February 2005 07:36 |
