| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
Fri, 11 February 2005 11:56
 
|
 |
It would be wise to consider an aftermarket ECU before highflowing the turbo 
Highflowing will not reduce lag in most cases.
The CT26 in standard form is not particularly laggy, and offers much better flow potential than the CT20. Its been covered dozens of times, and is a relatively easy fit.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Hi Flowing a ct20
|
skees | Fri, 11 February 2005 05:56 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
bunkyT18 | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:12 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
skees | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:45 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
KoinTA22 | Fri, 11 February 2005 11:28 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
TE72_Turbo | Fri, 11 February 2005 11:56 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
Hunty | Sat, 12 February 2005 05:40 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
Cool1 | Sat, 12 February 2005 06:11 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
TRD_Supra | Sat, 12 February 2005 08:05 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
Mr Revhead | Sat, 12 February 2005 10:34 |
|
Re: Hi Flowing a ct20
|
RAV-GT4 | Sun, 13 February 2005 02:48 |
