Author | Topic |

Location: Melbourne
Registered: November 2003
|
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Fri, 11 February 2005 14:03

|
 |
EldarO wrote on Fri, 11 February 2005 19:55 | i rekon stargate is shithouse all-around, as is buffy, angel, and all the other unoriginal crap thats on TV, the only show youll ever find me watching are, Rides, Myth Busters, Fawlty Towers and Pimp My Ride (a.k.a Rice My Ride)
|
You sir, are an idiot. How can you like Fawlty Towers AND Pimp My Ride?
Stargate is awsome. I think it lost something when it went crazy and it wasn't just about Egyptian mythology anymore, but it's still cool. I don't mind the political episodes, as they give some background and as has been said, breed good storylines. I hate flashback episodes though, in prettymuch every form. Wast - of - airtime.
One of the things I like about Stargate is the characters. They're just so funny... like all the time. I love the way it's a semi-comedy sci-fi, kinda like Doctor Who. Samantha kinda annoys me though. Her character seems a little under developed... and is there ANY character that HASN'T hit on her?
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Stargate = Lame-o
|
ra23celica | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:15 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Daemon | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:21 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
driftae86 | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:22 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Toy Yoda | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:26 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
driftae86 | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:31 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:29 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
ra23celica | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:33 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
draven | Fri, 11 February 2005 08:33 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:20 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
nitephyre | Sat, 12 February 2005 12:58 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
jackel | Sat, 12 February 2005 18:19 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
towe_001 | Sun, 13 February 2005 05:21 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
EldarO | Fri, 11 February 2005 08:55 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
unforgiven | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:59 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Shraka | Fri, 11 February 2005 14:03 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
EldarO | Fri, 11 February 2005 14:20 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Shraka | Sat, 12 February 2005 01:41 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
driftae86 | Fri, 11 February 2005 15:02 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
ra23celica | Fri, 11 February 2005 15:19 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
jackel | Fri, 11 February 2005 15:24 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Daemon | Fri, 11 February 2005 23:04 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Initial_D | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:54 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
unforgiven | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:56 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
riceburna73 | Sat, 12 February 2005 00:30 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Major Clod | Sat, 12 February 2005 03:49 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Beserker99 | Sat, 12 February 2005 05:18 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
jackel | Sat, 12 February 2005 06:30 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
towe_001 | Sun, 13 February 2005 05:12 |
Current Time:
Mon Jul 28 06:18:06 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0059609413146973 seconds |