Author | Topic |

Location: Perth
Registered: August 2003
|
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Sat, 12 February 2005 18:19

|
 |
CrUZsida wrote on Fri, 11 February 2005 18:20 |
draven wrote on Fri, 11 February 2005 16:33 | hands up all those who are currently using 35gb of HD space to store stargate? *puts hand up*
|
Hands up all those who want Greg to burn them a copy of said Stargate?
*puts hand up*
I can trade you for 9 gigs of macgyver (about 99/141 eps!)
|
what do i gotta do to get my hands on them 9 gigs
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Stargate = Lame-o
|
ra23celica | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:15 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Daemon | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:21 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
driftae86 | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:22 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Toy Yoda | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:26 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
driftae86 | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:31 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:29 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
ra23celica | Fri, 11 February 2005 07:33 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
draven | Fri, 11 February 2005 08:33 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:20 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
nitephyre | Sat, 12 February 2005 12:58 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
jackel | Sat, 12 February 2005 18:19 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
towe_001 | Sun, 13 February 2005 05:21 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
EldarO | Fri, 11 February 2005 08:55 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
unforgiven | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:59 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Shraka | Fri, 11 February 2005 14:03 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
EldarO | Fri, 11 February 2005 14:20 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Shraka | Sat, 12 February 2005 01:41 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
driftae86 | Fri, 11 February 2005 15:02 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
ra23celica | Fri, 11 February 2005 15:19 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
jackel | Fri, 11 February 2005 15:24 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Daemon | Fri, 11 February 2005 23:04 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Initial_D | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:54 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
unforgiven | Fri, 11 February 2005 10:56 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
riceburna73 | Sat, 12 February 2005 00:30 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Major Clod | Sat, 12 February 2005 03:49 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
Beserker99 | Sat, 12 February 2005 05:18 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
jackel | Sat, 12 February 2005 06:30 |
 |
Re: Stargate = Lame-o
|
towe_001 | Sun, 13 February 2005 05:12 |