| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: turbo....
|
Wed, 23 February 2005 02:33
 
|
 |
| Norbie wrote on Tue, 22 February 2005 22:38 |
Forced induction on a 2-stroke doesn't really work; any positive manifold pressure will cause most of the inlet charge to get blown straight out the exhaust. No valves you see...
|
Couldnt this be countered by an appropriate tuned pipe to provide more back pressure? Which is how a 2 stroke stops the fuel from doin a straight through anyway.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
turbo....
|
h3ff44 | Tue, 22 February 2005 05:59 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
EldarO | Tue, 22 February 2005 10:38 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Nolan | Tue, 22 February 2005 10:41 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Shraka | Tue, 22 February 2005 10:53 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
lang | Tue, 22 February 2005 11:08 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Norbie | Tue, 22 February 2005 11:38 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Shraka | Tue, 22 February 2005 11:43 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Allan | Tue, 22 February 2005 13:26 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
finney | Tue, 22 February 2005 14:08 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Squid | Wed, 23 February 2005 02:33 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Norbie | Wed, 23 February 2005 14:54 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Joshstix | Wed, 23 February 2005 22:12 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
h3ff44 | Wed, 23 February 2005 22:19 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
Major Clod | Tue, 22 February 2005 12:42 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
h3ff44 | Wed, 23 February 2005 02:16 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
finney | Wed, 23 February 2005 04:23 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
h3ff44 | Wed, 23 February 2005 05:41 |
|
Re: turbo....
|
h3ff44 | Thu, 24 February 2005 09:54 |
