| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Wed, 02 March 2005 02:16
 
|
 |
Joorsh,
The RB20 is the same size as an RB25/26/30 (apart from deck height), which is similar in dimensions to the JZ series engines. I've had a friend's VL turbo parked next to my Supra and there's very little difference in size. So I stand by my comment that the 1G is smaller and lighter.
The same friend broke his VLT gearbox and replaced it with an RB20DET box. I saw them both and they're nowhere near the same; the RB20 box was noticeably smaller and obviously weaker since it started making bearing noise within a couple of weeks.
The R32 RB20DET is rated at 210ps, same as the comparable 1G. The 1G develops its power and torque at higher revs than the RB20, which suggests to me the 1G is the revvier engine stock for stock (not that that's necessarily a good thing). Don't know about stock redline but that's not as relevant.
I know I'm Toyota biased but the 1G has the upper hand here IMO.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
rb20 vs iggte
|
h3ff44 | Sun, 27 February 2005 09:18 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
XiL3D | Sun, 27 February 2005 09:32 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Shraka | Sun, 27 February 2005 10:42 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
subsonicaudio | Sun, 27 February 2005 12:53 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Norbie | Sun, 27 February 2005 12:56 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 28 February 2005 03:11 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
h3ff44 | Mon, 28 February 2005 05:10 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
boxh34d | Mon, 28 February 2005 10:58 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
joorsh | Mon, 28 February 2005 11:42 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 28 February 2005 12:25 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
joorsh | Mon, 28 February 2005 13:33 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
MR 1JZ | Mon, 28 February 2005 22:08 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
tyottsoarer | Mon, 28 February 2005 14:33 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
boxh34d | Mon, 28 February 2005 21:42 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
TRD_Supra | Mon, 28 February 2005 22:00 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
joorsh | Tue, 01 March 2005 00:19 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
boxh34d | Wed, 02 March 2005 01:56 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Norbie | Wed, 02 March 2005 02:16 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
joorsh | Wed, 02 March 2005 04:18 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Mookie | Wed, 02 March 2005 04:24 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Corona RT142 | Wed, 02 March 2005 04:25 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Mookie | Wed, 02 March 2005 04:29 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Jag7799 | Wed, 02 March 2005 04:46 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Mookie | Wed, 02 March 2005 04:53 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
Norbie | Wed, 02 March 2005 05:08 |
|
Re: rb20 vs iggte
|
EMP-2TG | Wed, 02 March 2005 11:21 |
