Author | Topic |
I supported Toymods
Location: Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mon, 03 June 2002 21:48
|
|
Bill,
Quote: | It has been on a chassis dyno, at Chiptorque last week. It made 84kW but I know that the engine makes more than that. Reasons for this are - I have had the car with the old engine in it on another dyno and I made more power. This is the usual diferences between dyno's, and I'm sure that if I took the car to another one I'd get more like 100kW or so. I also have checked the injector duty cycle and from that they are flowing for for 185hp. This backs up the sim dyno program pretty well, as does the Chiptorque dyno run, as the HP curve followed the simmed one almost exactly. It's also backed up by the fact that it's at least as fast as a WRX in a straight line, possibly not too far of an Sti. How do I know this? Because we've got a WRX that has a kit on it that takes it to STi specs. I know what speed I can get up to on certain straights near my place, and the Sprinter is not very far behind at all.
|
That great Bill - it would be interesting to see the car on the same Dyno as the rest of us.
Quote: | I have no plans to drive to Sydney again in the future so that's not going to happen. And I see that you've yet again chosen to ignore my twice posting that a local member(s) can back up what I say. At no point did I say or write "tremendous power". Thanks for strongly inferring that I'm lying, it gives you so much credibility. Not.
|
It is not that I doubt the word of the local members, it is just the fact that unless they are really good at measuring hp and kw what they interpret to be may not neccessarily be what actually is. After all, gearbox and diff ratio's plus tyre compounds and overall vehicle weight all impact on a vehicles acceleration.
As for credibility - I am the record holder so I have that.
Quote: | So who was first to come up with actual valve sizes, etc?
|
Bill it is nice to see you got one thing right - then again you did mis-quote one of only two valve sizes.
Quote: | Excuse me? Attempting to be a sarcastic smartarse doesn't work if you don't know what you're talking about. I've been rallying on & off since 1984, circuit racing since 1990 and in circuit racing I've run at my classes National championships a number of times and always finished in the top three places. I've qualifed on pole for the Nationals twice, and also beaten professional racing drivers (Terry Sheid) in a faster car then mine. (Mallock Mk31) So yes I do know a little about turning up to an event thank you very much.
|
Well I do know, in fact if beating something is a measure even my car has beaten WRX's in street racing.....Big Deal. I don not care what you have done or who you raced - I was talking about TOYMODS EVENTS in over two years of attending Toymods events - I have yet to see you at one! Your choice - my undefeated title.
Cya
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 01 June 2002 23:37 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 01 June 2002 23:46 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
IRA11Y | Sun, 02 June 2002 00:24 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Sun, 02 June 2002 14:07 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 02 June 2002 22:52 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Teenz | Mon, 03 June 2002 00:08 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Mon, 03 June 2002 00:10 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 03 June 2002 03:45 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
MRTA22 | Mon, 03 June 2002 04:32 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Mon, 03 June 2002 05:15 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Teenz | Mon, 03 June 2002 05:59 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Pumpkin | Mon, 03 June 2002 06:16 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
IRA11Y | Mon, 03 June 2002 08:43 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 03 June 2002 09:22 |
|
I have a solution
|
blackburnfan | Mon, 03 June 2002 09:45 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Seadog | Mon, 03 June 2002 13:03 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Mon, 03 June 2002 14:54 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Teenz | Mon, 03 June 2002 21:48 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Incredible_Serious | Mon, 03 June 2002 23:15 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Mon, 03 June 2002 22:41 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Corvid | Mon, 03 June 2002 23:45 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 04 June 2002 00:16 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Seadog | Tue, 04 June 2002 00:32 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Tue, 04 June 2002 00:40 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 04:54 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 04 June 2002 05:13 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Tue, 04 June 2002 05:49 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 04 June 2002 06:05 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 07:23 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Sam | Tue, 04 June 2002 08:02 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 04 June 2002 08:46 |
|
Now HERE's something constructive...
|
Mr 20Valve | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:07 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:35 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 04 June 2002 10:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Incredible_Serious | Tue, 04 June 2002 11:31 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 12:10 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Jonny2TG | Tue, 04 June 2002 12:44 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Johnny | Tue, 04 June 2002 13:02 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 22:36 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Wed, 05 June 2002 02:14 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Wed, 05 June 2002 07:33 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Incredible_Serious | Wed, 05 June 2002 07:36 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Wed, 05 June 2002 07:48 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 05 June 2002 08:41 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Johnny | Wed, 05 June 2002 09:37 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
IRA11Y | Thu, 06 June 2002 06:18 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
fOOZ86 | Thu, 13 June 2002 19:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Thu, 13 June 2002 19:38 |
Current Time:
Fri Nov 15 17:27:38 UTC 2024 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0098159313201904 seconds |