Author | Topic |
Location: toowoomba qld
Registered: March 2004
|
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Thu, 03 March 2005 10:21

|
 |
I always thought diesel was the left overs when they made petrol??
The reason why I think super was the best is the fact it smelt alot better then unleaded, and didn't blow smoke everywhere like diesel, can't see myself how both unleaded and diesel are bettter for the enviroment?
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
optimax = shit ?
|
duff_boy | Wed, 02 March 2005 06:00 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
StuC | Wed, 02 March 2005 06:05 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
duff_boy | Wed, 02 March 2005 06:09 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
finney | Wed, 02 March 2005 06:28 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
FWDCelica | Wed, 02 March 2005 08:14 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
coFF33 | Wed, 02 March 2005 08:18 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Toobs | Wed, 02 March 2005 08:18 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
dimmy77_03 | Wed, 02 March 2005 09:10 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Arch | Wed, 02 March 2005 08:41 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
old_mr2 | Wed, 02 March 2005 10:05 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
paulw85 | Wed, 02 March 2005 10:08 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
drft spec - st167 | Wed, 02 March 2005 10:22 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
duff_boy | Thu, 03 March 2005 05:55 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Bugman | Thu, 03 March 2005 06:04 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Celia-Sue | Thu, 03 March 2005 07:56 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
paulw85 | Thu, 03 March 2005 09:07 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Thu, 03 March 2005 09:46 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Celia-Sue | Thu, 03 March 2005 09:54 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
mick | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:02 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:06 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
mick | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:14 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
mick | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:15 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:17 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
mick | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:21 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:01 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
paulw85 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:04 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Celia-Sue | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:10 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:12 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
paulw85 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:13 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Celia-Sue | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:18 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:22 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
mick | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:24 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Celia-Sue | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:25 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
mick | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:30 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
paulw85 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:25 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Thu, 03 March 2005 10:57 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Julz | Thu, 03 March 2005 12:53 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
rthy | Thu, 03 March 2005 13:54 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Big T | Thu, 03 March 2005 14:27 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
st184 sillycar | Thu, 03 March 2005 23:19 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
old_mr2 | Mon, 07 March 2005 07:35 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Corona RT142 | Thu, 03 March 2005 23:45 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
joorsh | Thu, 03 March 2005 23:53 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
Corona RT142 | Fri, 04 March 2005 00:04 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
SupraPete | Fri, 04 March 2005 04:20 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
mick | Fri, 04 March 2005 04:25 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
studman | Fri, 04 March 2005 04:47 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
1G-GTE KE70 | Fri, 04 March 2005 05:25 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
EnFlaMEd | Fri, 04 March 2005 07:34 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
paulw85 | Mon, 07 March 2005 07:05 |
 |
Re: optimax = shit ?
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 07 March 2005 08:05 |
Current Time:
Wed Aug 6 05:25:47 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0059940814971924 seconds |