| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
February 2003
|
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Fri, 04 March 2005 06:31
 
|
 |
| 4agte wrote on Thu, 03 March 2005 18:14 |
| thechuckster wrote on Wed, 02 March 2005 23:43 |
my 18Rturbo is 7.4:1 - with the oldskool T04 it got on boost at just under 3k
|
not talking about when it spools up but how much power it will make off boost if you have good comp then it will seem less laggy although the turbo will spool up at the same time
|
was reasonably perky - probably due to excessively high timing and the carbi feeding too much fuel 
the uber low compression was to let it deal with non-hemi chamber, steel, non-cross-flow head. It was also at the suggestion of the original supplier of the turbo. long story ... <grrr>
is being replaced by a smaller & newer turbo and some custom EFI gear to improve response and tunability (of which it had none of the later). It should spool up quicker but produce less boost.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Wed, 02 March 2005 10:49 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Wed, 02 March 2005 10:53 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Wed, 02 March 2005 11:18 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Wed, 02 March 2005 11:37 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
thechuckster | Wed, 02 March 2005 12:43 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Thu, 03 March 2005 08:14 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
thechuckster | Fri, 04 March 2005 06:31 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Fri, 04 March 2005 07:16 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Cool1 | Wed, 02 March 2005 12:48 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Thu, 03 March 2005 07:41 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Norbie | Thu, 03 March 2005 11:21 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
THE WITZL | Thu, 03 March 2005 23:24 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Mr DOHC | Fri, 04 March 2005 06:22 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 04 March 2005 07:39 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
YelloRolla | Fri, 04 March 2005 08:51 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Fri, 04 March 2005 09:48 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
sideshow | Fri, 04 March 2005 11:43 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Norbie | Fri, 04 March 2005 15:19 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
fatmr2 | Fri, 04 March 2005 21:15 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Sun, 06 March 2005 08:12 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Steve M | Sat, 05 March 2005 00:08 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Sat, 05 March 2005 11:09 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Sat, 05 March 2005 12:06 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
MS-75 | Sat, 05 March 2005 11:57 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
YelloRolla | Sun, 06 March 2005 06:54 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Sun, 06 March 2005 09:44 |
