| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Rocklea qld
Registered:
February 2003
|
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Sun, 06 March 2005 09:44
|
 |
|
does anyone know the thickness of a standard headgasket??? im considerin on of them now im hearing other stories about the copper ones. but on the other hand clancey from the forum ran a copper one and had troubles. as soon as he oringed it he had no more problems with blowing gaskets.. other thing i can consider is run rc pistons with standard gasket. how strong are the rc pistons compared to the rg ones. does anyone know of a rg headgasket that has metal rings in the centre that are actually circles and not wierd out of shape circles..everytime i got one they were cheap and nasty. other i guess that has to come into it is how much has been taken from the block and head when getting machined.....but from what im hearing i should try to keep up the comp so i guess standard is gonna be better?
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Wed, 02 March 2005 10:49 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Wed, 02 March 2005 10:53 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Wed, 02 March 2005 11:18 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Wed, 02 March 2005 11:37 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
thechuckster | Wed, 02 March 2005 12:43 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Thu, 03 March 2005 08:14 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
thechuckster | Fri, 04 March 2005 06:31 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Fri, 04 March 2005 07:16 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Cool1 | Wed, 02 March 2005 12:48 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Thu, 03 March 2005 07:41 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Norbie | Thu, 03 March 2005 11:21 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
THE WITZL | Thu, 03 March 2005 23:24 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Mr DOHC | Fri, 04 March 2005 06:22 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 04 March 2005 07:39 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
YelloRolla | Fri, 04 March 2005 08:51 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Fri, 04 March 2005 09:48 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
sideshow | Fri, 04 March 2005 11:43 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Norbie | Fri, 04 March 2005 15:19 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
fatmr2 | Fri, 04 March 2005 21:15 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
4agte | Sun, 06 March 2005 08:12 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
Steve M | Sat, 05 March 2005 00:08 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Sat, 05 March 2005 11:09 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Sat, 05 March 2005 12:06 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
MS-75 | Sat, 05 March 2005 11:57 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
YelloRolla | Sun, 06 March 2005 06:54 |
|
Re: compression...how low is to low (boosted engine)
|
people100 | Sun, 06 March 2005 09:44 |
