Author | Topic |

Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
Thu, 10 March 2005 03:17

|
 |
No, by positive camber I mean exactly that. Positive Camber...
teh fully sik droifto look is negative camber. MA61 struts have a lesser amount of fully hectix dorifto camber. MA61 struts have about 2.5 -> 3 deg less negative camber when compared to RA6X/SA63 struts I believe (when placed into a MA61 anyway...).
I suspect you will already have enough positive camber issues, but if your still interested I'll send you a PM.
Cheers
Wilbo
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
fourwheeldemon | Tue, 08 March 2005 04:19 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
setsuna | Tue, 08 March 2005 05:14 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
wilbo666 | Tue, 08 March 2005 07:43 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
fourwheeldemon | Tue, 08 March 2005 12:04 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
wilbo666 | Tue, 08 March 2005 23:53 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
fourwheeldemon | Wed, 09 March 2005 12:35 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
wilbo666 | Thu, 10 March 2005 03:17 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
TerryOBeirne | Tue, 15 March 2005 11:16 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
wilbo666 | Wed, 16 March 2005 03:44 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
fourwheeldemon | Sat, 12 March 2005 08:21 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
setsuna | Sat, 12 March 2005 10:29 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
fourwheeldemon | Mon, 14 March 2005 09:11 |
 |
Re: wtd: complete ra60, ra65 or sa63 (powersteering model) struts
|
fourwheeldemon | Wed, 16 March 2005 09:36 |