| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
Tue, 15 March 2005 02:29
 
|
 |
| sated wrote on Thu, 10 March 2005 11:31 |
If they had one which would delete itself and or format the HD atter 3 wrong password attempts .. would actually be quite nice. Dont want gmail getting their hands on my work.
|
That could be counted as a virus, malicous code which the user doesn't expect to run.
I have being playing with a security idea for my stuff.
on open ping my server (always on static ip)
server runs in stealth unless ping is from a known IP address
if ping responds:
Run the application as intended (ie i was expecting this ip address to run this app)
otherwise
Run a DMZ application (ie a dummy to fool the user into thinking they are looking at something, but it is really a load of crap. I make another thread which opens a modified minesweeper game.)
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
sated | Wed, 09 March 2005 22:53 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
Nark | Wed, 09 March 2005 22:57 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
sated | Wed, 09 March 2005 23:01 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
Nark | Wed, 09 March 2005 23:03 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
sated | Thu, 10 March 2005 00:31 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
Squid | Tue, 15 March 2005 02:29 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
RWDboy | Thu, 10 March 2005 13:51 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
Nark | Thu, 10 March 2005 13:55 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
sated | Thu, 10 March 2005 15:34 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
fade-e | Thu, 10 March 2005 16:04 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
sated | Thu, 10 March 2005 20:34 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
Alchemist | Sat, 12 March 2005 04:04 |
|
Re: 128 Bit encryption - Safe of not ?
|
sated | Sat, 12 March 2005 18:34 |
