| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: 98-99 camry differences pls help
|
Sun, 20 March 2005 11:13
 
|
 |
|
both seem pretty good on fuel. 4 cyls the cheaper to run. The V6 is a bloody great performer (espically in manual form) was quicker then the Holden Commodore N/A V6 and the Ford Falcon 6 at the Time. better on fuel then the both of them. I'd perfer the V6 myself, but It maybe cheaper to opt for the 4 cyl both are pretty realible. I don't know the exact fuel ecconomy figures but the four is the cheapest fuel wise.
|
|
|
