Author | Topic |
Location: Sydney
Registered: May 2002
|
Now HERE's something constructive...
|
Tue, 04 June 2002 09:07
|
|
Alright, here's my attempt to settle the argument once & for all...
the topic was 4A vs 2T
the heated debate which went on for a while there (before we started arguing about thermostats of all things... Jebus! ) was that the 2T was better due to the fact that capacity could be increased easily. Bill then pointed out that increase in capacity on a 4A was just as easy, however stated that in a true comparison of factory based engines, the 1600cc capacity should be retained... i tend to agree. in order to back this up, here's an analogy im sure we can all relate to...
Okay, imagine that the 4A and the 2T are pairs of tits.
thats right, TITS... breasts.
each is a couple of nice, firm handfuls of goodness. extrememly similar, but slightly diferent... nearly identical in all respects.
the nipples can easily be tweaked on both for added stimulation, further enhancing the tits, and increasing their appeal. (this can be related to cams or headwork i suppose )
next we can add something such as some nice, lacy, black lingerie, so further enhance the tits... both sets of tits will easily accomodate such underwear, once again, adding to their appeal. (this can be related to ancileries such as manifolds, ignition systems etc. )
now, both sets of tits can also be modified extensively with the addition of SILICONE IMPLANTS... (these can be directly related to an increase in capacity, obviously... ) if we add silicone implants to the 2T tits, and not the 4A tits, well then of course the 2T tits are going to be much more appealing... but unfortunately, its not really a fair comparison anymore in my mind... jack those 4A titties up with some of Dow Corning's finest, however, and the comparison becomes much more level, and as always, much more exciting.
(i guess instead of comparing apples with apples, in this case we could be comparing melons with melons, huh?... )
now if that isnt the most relevant, constructive & polite post in the entire series of these threads, i'll eat my hat.
the whole point being that theyre both pretty damn cool, but it all comes down to what those tits are attached to in the end though, doesnt it? (same with the engines.)
**oh, and if anyone says, i dont like big tits, then you're a homo **
[Updated on: Tue, 04 June 2002 09:40]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 01 June 2002 23:37 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 01 June 2002 23:46 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
IRA11Y | Sun, 02 June 2002 00:24 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Sun, 02 June 2002 14:07 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 02 June 2002 22:52 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Teenz | Mon, 03 June 2002 00:08 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Mon, 03 June 2002 00:10 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 03 June 2002 03:45 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
MRTA22 | Mon, 03 June 2002 04:32 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Mon, 03 June 2002 05:15 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Teenz | Mon, 03 June 2002 05:59 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Pumpkin | Mon, 03 June 2002 06:16 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
IRA11Y | Mon, 03 June 2002 08:43 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 03 June 2002 09:22 |
|
I have a solution
|
blackburnfan | Mon, 03 June 2002 09:45 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Seadog | Mon, 03 June 2002 13:03 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Mon, 03 June 2002 14:54 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Teenz | Mon, 03 June 2002 21:48 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Incredible_Serious | Mon, 03 June 2002 23:15 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Mon, 03 June 2002 22:41 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Corvid | Mon, 03 June 2002 23:45 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 04 June 2002 00:16 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Seadog | Tue, 04 June 2002 00:32 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Tue, 04 June 2002 00:40 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 04:54 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 04 June 2002 05:13 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Tue, 04 June 2002 05:49 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 04 June 2002 06:05 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 07:23 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Sam | Tue, 04 June 2002 08:02 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 04 June 2002 08:46 |
|
Now HERE's something constructive...
|
Mr 20Valve | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:07 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:35 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Tue, 04 June 2002 09:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 04 June 2002 10:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Incredible_Serious | Tue, 04 June 2002 11:31 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 12:10 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Jonny2TG | Tue, 04 June 2002 12:44 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Johnny | Tue, 04 June 2002 13:02 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
thetoyman75 | Tue, 04 June 2002 22:36 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Wed, 05 June 2002 02:14 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Wed, 05 June 2002 07:33 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Incredible_Serious | Wed, 05 June 2002 07:36 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Mr 20Valve | Wed, 05 June 2002 07:48 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 05 June 2002 08:41 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Johnny | Wed, 05 June 2002 09:37 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
IRA11Y | Thu, 06 June 2002 06:18 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
fOOZ86 | Thu, 13 June 2002 19:29 |
|
Re: 2TG/4AG part 2
|
Karl_skewes | Thu, 13 June 2002 19:38 |
Current Time:
Fri Nov 15 17:40:45 UTC 2024 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0064339637756348 seconds |