| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Wed, 04 December 2002 05:23
 
|
 |
| TurboRA28 wrote on Wed, 04 December 2002 14:03 |
Though what I think is stupid like in an RA28, the fuel filler neck, breather pipes etc all run through the back of the car
|
That's different - none of those components have high-pressure fuel in them. If you're in an accident and the breather pipe ruptures, it's not going to spray fuel around the passenger compartment at 40psi is it? When you think about it that way, keeping the fuel pumps and fuel lines under the car is just common sense.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Re: surge tank legalities
|
trueno_gze | Wed, 04 December 2002 03:43 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Norbie | Wed, 04 December 2002 03:53 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Dodgy_Haro | Wed, 04 December 2002 03:57 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
TurboRA28 | Wed, 04 December 2002 04:03 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Norbie | Wed, 04 December 2002 05:23 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
rob_RA40 | Wed, 04 December 2002 04:16 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Bugman | Wed, 04 December 2002 09:07 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
trueno_gze | Wed, 04 December 2002 11:34 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Bugman | Wed, 04 December 2002 11:41 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
PayneyCelica18rg | Thu, 05 December 2002 01:47 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Norbie | Thu, 05 December 2002 01:53 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
PayneyCelica18rg | Thu, 05 December 2002 02:42 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Bugman | Thu, 05 December 2002 02:53 |
|
Re: surge tank legalities
|
Norbie | Thu, 05 December 2002 03:46 |
