Author | Topic |
![](images/custom_avatars/422)
Location: Adelaide
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
Thu, 31 March 2005 10:25
![Go to previous message Go to previous message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/up.gif)
|
![](blank.gif) |
Black,
Rex suggests the type of suspension is of little consequence, providing it keeps the wheel dead flat at all times: eg, cruising, breaking, cornering etc.
Having said that, He believs that the double wishbone offers a slight advantage because when designing a system from scratch (eg a Clubman or Whatever) The arms can be oriented to add or remove camber from a wheel as a car rolls onto/off of its suspension.
Saying that, Old Mac Pherson and his farm struts are the more easily tuned of factory systems.
Installing coil-overs in a double wishbone is too of little consequence as the arms remain in their spot.
However when the ride height of any car is altered, so too is the roll centre's of the wheel.
Big, tricky area indeed, suspension is.
Rex
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
BlackSupra | Thu, 31 March 2005 09:33 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
Rex_Kelway | Thu, 31 March 2005 10:25 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
RWDboy | Thu, 31 March 2005 12:11 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
BlackSupra | Thu, 31 March 2005 12:12 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
THE WITZL | Thu, 31 March 2005 22:11 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 31 March 2005 22:26 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
RobertoX | Thu, 31 March 2005 22:25 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
Joshstix | Fri, 01 April 2005 01:10 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
RobertoX | Fri, 01 April 2005 01:48 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
gold28 | Fri, 01 April 2005 03:56 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
HyDrA | Sat, 02 April 2005 07:22 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
gold28 | Sun, 03 April 2005 00:12 |
![Read Message Read Message](http://forums.toymods.org.au/theme/default/images/pmsg_read.gif) |
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 03 April 2005 00:44 |