| 
| Author | Topic | 
|---|
 
|  
 Toymods Social Secretary
 
 Location:
 Sydney
 Registered:
 July 2002
 | 
	| Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) |  Fri, 01 April 2005 01:51    |  |  |  
	| the witzl should also read what is already posted. 
 
 If you have an E58-11C box (LSD), then you SHOULD NOT use this on an amtospheric engine..... you car will become UBER SLOW.
 
 I recommend SELLING your E58 box and buying a 20V C56 box, as it will be CHEAPER, EASIER, and make your car FASTER.
 A E58 would do the oposite in every case.
 
 To fit the E58, you need a clutch which has the larger input spline centre. NO you cannot just use a GZE clutch, as this does NOT fit the 4age flywheel, you would have to either get a gze flywheel and gze clutch, or get a custom clutch disc made to suit the larger input spline of the GZE box.
 
 
 You see my reasoning???
 GET THE C56!!!
 |  |  |  |  
 
|  | Subject | Poster | Date | 
|---|
 
|  |    AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | bayka | Tue, 29 March 2005 15:39 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | Johnny | Wed, 30 March 2005 08:49 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | Bobski | Thu, 31 March 2005 06:32 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | Johnny | Thu, 31 March 2005 13:21 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | bayka | Thu, 31 March 2005 16:37 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | Johnny | Fri, 01 April 2005 12:38 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | THE WITZL | Fri, 01 April 2005 01:12 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | THE WITZL | Fri, 01 April 2005 01:51 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | Bobski | Fri, 01 April 2005 02:15 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | THE WITZL | Fri, 01 April 2005 03:00 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | Bobski | Fri, 01 April 2005 03:11 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | bayka | Fri, 01 April 2005 05:38 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | THE WITZL | Fri, 01 April 2005 06:55 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | bayka | Fri, 01 April 2005 08:46 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | FASTFOO | Fri, 01 April 2005 13:18 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | THE WITZL | Sat, 02 April 2005 02:36 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | inertia | Sun, 03 April 2005 10:33 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | bayka | Sat, 02 April 2005 17:27 |  
|  |    Re: AE101 box VS AE92 box (differences in dimensions, flywheel etc) | arasta | Tue, 03 May 2005 05:50 |  
 | Current Time: 
Fri Oct 31 16:27:38 UTC 2025 | 
 
  Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0041790008544922 seconds |