| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Arthurs Creek, Victoria
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fri, 01 April 2005 02:21
 
|
 |
smt_007:
My take on that one mate: The 1g-gte plenum is good to start with. But, if you want to make it better $600 will get it power ported to spec by (as fattony said) Andrew @ Power porting.
The Exhaust manifold... Hrmm.. A sour point of contention. I think he's strangling the flow of the motor with the way he makes his manifolds. Fattony would disagree, but this is because he has one and I don't. However, the proof will be in the pudding and Fattony is going to put it to the test soon enough and we'll see how good it is.
On a slightly more general note though, I would think that the larger the runners, the more space for potential flow and therefore a larger potential for modification. That said, it does work, as Fattony's shows.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Wed, 30 March 2005 01:49 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Dominic | Wed, 30 March 2005 01:55 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Wed, 30 March 2005 02:03 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Joshstix | Wed, 30 March 2005 02:14 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Wed, 30 March 2005 02:50 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Joshstix | Wed, 30 March 2005 04:59 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
EMP-2TG | Wed, 30 March 2005 07:07 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Joshstix | Wed, 30 March 2005 09:09 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
mrshin | Wed, 30 March 2005 14:51 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
earlyrolla | Wed, 30 March 2005 15:06 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
stradlater | Thu, 31 March 2005 03:06 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Thu, 31 March 2005 07:51 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Thu, 31 March 2005 08:40 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Fri, 01 April 2005 00:08 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
stradlater | Fri, 01 April 2005 02:21 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Fri, 01 April 2005 03:06 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
stradlater | Fri, 01 April 2005 04:00 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Sat, 02 April 2005 03:38 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Fri, 01 April 2005 08:32 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Testa_Dura | Fri, 01 April 2005 08:51 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Grega | Fri, 01 April 2005 21:45 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
mrshin | Sat, 02 April 2005 03:48 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
stradlater | Sat, 02 April 2005 08:25 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Sun, 03 April 2005 04:19 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Sun, 03 April 2005 04:48 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
stradlater | Sun, 03 April 2005 04:41 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Sun, 03 April 2005 04:46 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
stradlater | Sun, 03 April 2005 04:48 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Sun, 03 April 2005 04:59 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Sun, 03 April 2005 05:32 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
Fattony | Mon, 04 April 2005 00:12 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
stradlater | Mon, 04 April 2005 01:38 |
|
Re: Alex Decarlis_10 Second_1ggte_TA22_[Article]
|
smt_007 | Mon, 04 April 2005 10:11 |
