| Author | Topic |
|---|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Epping, Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
Thu, 05 December 2002 05:49
|
 |
there's quite a bit of a weight difference, with the main problem being ALL that weight is going to be at the front tip of your car.
I dont know why you'd keep the standard box... I'd be using the gearbox from the 1g halfcut.
plus a 1jz half cut will set you back a grand or 2 more than a 1g, and it'll be a real bitch to get in (considering the 1g is a bit of a suqeeze,m and the 1j is longer
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
FS: RA65 celica $??? - SOLD
|
draven | Mon, 18 November 2002 18:54 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
EvilJack | Mon, 02 December 2002 23:01 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
draven | Tue, 03 December 2002 08:28 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
Kman | Tue, 03 December 2002 12:57 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
draven | Tue, 03 December 2002 13:15 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
Kman | Wed, 04 December 2002 12:52 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
stylez | Tue, 03 December 2002 11:58 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
EvilJack | Tue, 03 December 2002 12:21 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 05 December 2002 00:39 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
draven | Thu, 05 December 2002 01:11 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
Kman | Thu, 05 December 2002 05:04 |
|
Re: FS: RA65 celica $???
|
draven | Thu, 05 December 2002 05:49 |
