| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
Sun, 03 April 2005 00:44
|
 |
all i can say is it depends on how much the car rolls...
the point of having a camber curve is not to keep the camber when the car rolls, but to keep the tyre as flat as possible relative to road, regardless of what the body of the car is doing.
if the car doesn't roll much, you don't need much camber.
if it rolls a lot, you need heaps of camber to keep tyre flat during cornering.
how you achieve that is up to you, but think of MS as a relatively fixed camber setup (only changes as the lower arm changes it's "width"), and DW as a variable camber setup.
Cya, Stewart
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
BlackSupra | Thu, 31 March 2005 09:33 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
Rex_Kelway | Thu, 31 March 2005 10:25 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
RWDboy | Thu, 31 March 2005 12:11 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
BlackSupra | Thu, 31 March 2005 12:12 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
THE WITZL | Thu, 31 March 2005 22:11 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 31 March 2005 22:26 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
RobertoX | Thu, 31 March 2005 22:25 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
Joshstix | Fri, 01 April 2005 01:10 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
RobertoX | Fri, 01 April 2005 01:48 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
gold28 | Fri, 01 April 2005 03:56 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
HyDrA | Sat, 02 April 2005 07:22 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
gold28 | Sun, 03 April 2005 00:12 |
|
Re: Double wishbone suspension vs. macpherson strut
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 03 April 2005 00:44 |
