| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Registered:
March 2005
|
|
Re: 3T-GTE (minus turbo) vs 4A-GE
|
Mon, 04 April 2005 11:51
 
|
 |
Quick points:
4A-GE will be difficult to install compared with any T motor, requiring different gearbox, tailshaft, etc.
3T-GTEU will basically bolt in place of your 3T-C (just passenger side engine mount will need to be modified a bit).
Either motor will require loom mods, computer (OEM or otherwise), etc. etc. to run.
Removing the turbocharger from the 3T-GT is not a good idea, as it runs low compression to facilitate turbocharging and would give poor performance in naturally aspirated form. Additionally, the injection mapping and ignition curve is configured for the turbocharged application. Physical removal of the turbocharger will also require modification of the oil and coolant fittings which supply the turbocharger housing.
If you do go ahead with this, the 3T-C extractors will fit.
If you want a replacement naturally aspirated motor for insurance purposes, consider a 2T-G or derivitave. Search these forums for more information.
In terms of 'performance for dollars'...
$ : 2T-G < 3T-GT (minus turbo) < 4A-GE
HP: 3T-GT (minus turbo) < 2T-G < 4A-GE
I'd be going 2T-G for your application.
|
|
|
