Author | Topic |

Registered: June 2002
|
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
Sun, 10 April 2005 00:19

|
 |
MR 1GGTE wrote on Sat, 09 April 2005 22:45 | thanks for your input E30-323ti i was always under the imporession the TD0625G would be a little large for the 1JZ but it sounds like you have some experience on the matter, I am really after something that will give me boost as early as the stock Ct12a's but spin something like 260-180rwkw all the way to the glorious redline, do you think the GT3040 would do that?
also one the turbo upgrade an internal gate is a definitie no no, with it becoming mainly a track orientated car with the occasional bit of street driving (not everyday obviously) an external gate with a screamer is a definite 
|
I ran a TD-06 25G on my Evo, and it was very good, but I don't think the plain -06 Turbine and housing will cut it on a 1JZ, where as a -06SH has a bigger Turbine & housing (12 or 14cm I think opposed to the 8cm of the -06), the front half will flow plenty!!
As for the GT2540, the backend is basically the same as a T28 or T25 off a 200SX which is even smaller the the -06, and I think the biggest housing you can get is 0.86 (stock size on a GTiR!!) and are internally gated, so you'd need to seal it.
Slylux on here has a GT3040 on his 1JZ Hilux and is putting down ~400rwhp!!
From what he emailed me it doesn't seem much laggier than stock!!
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Thu, 07 April 2005 02:20 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 07 April 2005 03:01 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 07 April 2005 03:11 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Thu, 07 April 2005 03:12 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
Celia-Sue | Thu, 07 April 2005 05:18 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
Esselte | Thu, 07 April 2005 07:10 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Thu, 07 April 2005 07:17 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
Celia-Sue | Thu, 07 April 2005 07:33 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
lumpy | Thu, 07 April 2005 07:42 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Thu, 07 April 2005 08:43 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 07 April 2005 08:47 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
quest | Fri, 08 April 2005 09:02 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Fri, 08 April 2005 09:10 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
manmx83 | Fri, 08 April 2005 15:16 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
mx83toy | Fri, 08 April 2005 17:33 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
Danish | Sat, 09 April 2005 04:50 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Sat, 09 April 2005 07:35 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
E30-323ti | Sat, 09 April 2005 10:25 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Sat, 09 April 2005 10:45 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
E30-323ti | Sun, 10 April 2005 00:19 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
takai | Sat, 09 April 2005 11:09 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Sat, 09 April 2005 11:21 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
takai | Sat, 09 April 2005 11:36 |
 |
Re: 1JZ - Emanage or better?
|
MR 1JZ | Sun, 10 April 2005 00:55 |