| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
Wed, 11 December 2002 00:03
 
|
 |
The 4A-FC does exist, and yes, its a carby 4A-F from an AE92.
All are twin cams but they have a single cam belt to one cam shaft, than a cog from one cam to the other, so its greatly different from a 4A-GE.
It is a x-flow head, which means in a FWD car, intake at the back, exhaust at the front.
Same block as a 4A-C, so it will mate up with the C5* gearboxes, and use the same drivers side engine mount.
FWIK all engines in an AE92 are unleaded, but i may be wrong (still driving an LRP car *sigh*)
Craig.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
4AC compare to 4AFC
|
pepsicola | Tue, 10 December 2002 13:59 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
M.W.P. | Tue, 10 December 2002 14:38 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
pepsicola | Tue, 10 December 2002 14:46 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
EvilJack | Tue, 10 December 2002 22:04 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
haggis | Wed, 11 December 2002 00:03 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
Richard84 | Wed, 11 December 2002 01:51 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
bliz | Wed, 08 January 2003 03:17 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
zarathos | Wed, 08 January 2003 06:10 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
urban_myth | Wed, 02 March 2005 07:56 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
urban_myth | Thu, 03 March 2005 09:11 |
|
Re: 4AC compare to 4AFC
|
IRA11Y | Thu, 03 March 2005 21:11 |
