Author | Topic |
Location: Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered: January 2003
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Fri, 22 April 2005 23:33
|
|
chrisellis wrote on Fri, 22 April 2005 10:56 |
79rollaboy wrote on Fri, 22 April 2005 09:30 | I didn't think NAWS was flamable but only provides more oxygen for combustion when it is mixed with a flammable material i.e. fuel... although I guess if you had a little fire going and then supplied it with NAWS the fire would pick up considerably... but the material itself is not flammable right? Doesnt say it on the bottle...
|
true, under normal conditions it is not flammable. And even having a little fire going and adding N2O to it wouldnt do shit. It needs above 300 degrees Celcius to break down into nitrogen and oxygen, at which time it will assist in adding more fuel to the fire.
*i think anyway, willing to stand corrected*
|
no, it's an oxidiser, but any flame is well above 300deg. anyone with a whipped crem thingy will have probably fanned flames with it at some stage and know that it greatly increases the rate of combustion and temp... it is not as good an oxidiser as oxygen (ie "oxygen lance" ), but will still make a small fire very bad very quickly. the amount of N2O in a car is small compared to the amount of fuel, but it could certainly get a fire started quick ..
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Chris Davey | Wed, 20 April 2005 03:23 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
davedave | Wed, 20 April 2005 04:06 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Dirty_Sanchez | Wed, 20 April 2005 05:55 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
h3ff44 | Wed, 20 April 2005 06:05 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Mookie | Fri, 22 April 2005 01:16 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Chris Davey | Fri, 22 April 2005 06:59 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Mookie | Sat, 23 April 2005 07:00 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
ae86drift | Wed, 20 April 2005 06:16 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Major Clod | Thu, 21 April 2005 14:13 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
RobST162 | Fri, 22 April 2005 00:30 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
fade-e | Thu, 21 April 2005 14:24 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
thechuckster | Thu, 21 April 2005 16:11 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
EldarO | Thu, 21 April 2005 15:43 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
EldarO | Thu, 21 April 2005 16:38 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
79rollaboy | Thu, 21 April 2005 23:30 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
chrisellis | Fri, 22 April 2005 00:56 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
..J.. | Fri, 22 April 2005 02:22 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 22 April 2005 23:33 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
BlackSupra | Sat, 23 April 2005 00:34 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
skellator | Sat, 23 April 2005 01:09 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
79rollaboy | Sat, 23 April 2005 01:33 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Rolla Boy | Sat, 23 April 2005 02:28 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
skellator | Sat, 23 April 2005 02:50 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
draven | Sat, 23 April 2005 04:06 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
smt_007 | Sat, 23 April 2005 11:35 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Chris Davey | Sun, 24 April 2005 01:20 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
EldarO | Sun, 24 April 2005 05:01 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
79rollaboy | Sun, 24 April 2005 05:08 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
Chris Davey | Sun, 24 April 2005 06:53 |
|
Re: N2O is bad mmmmmkay!
|
skellator | Sun, 24 April 2005 08:15 |
Current Time:
Thu Jan 23 20:32:21 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0073390007019043 seconds |