Author | Topic |
Registered: January 2004
|
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Sat, 28 May 2005 05:16
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08f06/08f06b61beed2bfe3d7de66a6e3b8d431a6c88cc" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ee0/77ee018e1e3677253faa722e08a31e0d56c9dccf" alt="" |
Takai, with regards to engine size they tested anumber of engines upto 90mm bore size, 5 valve substantially better. as to the 20v head just being chucked on a bottom end comeon guys get with it!!! we can only imagine the amount of R&D toyota and yamaha did before this motor went into production, Takai you make it sound like a decision they made over coffee, I very much doubt that!!and as for sayin well yamaha did the development work for the R1 Well bloody hell is it a suprise to find out that they also developed the 20v 4age for toyota!!!!!Takai alot of your thoughts on port size are definately 80's thinking! Takai I also don't know where you got your information for airflow, but the tech paper shows airflow versus valve lift and airflow versus rpm and again the 20v is far superior!!It doesn't significantly decrease, it significantly increases!! as rpm was increased VE for 4 valve dropped off as VE for 5 valve increased.Takai the valve angles on a 20v are far superior ESPECIALLY when you consider intake port angle!!! yeah no short turn there baby, if you think this is wrong look at ALL modern motors to see the difference in port angle, 20v does have one of the steepest but it follows the convention of many high speed motors in this regards, the old trend was very wide valve angle and flat intake port this is OLD SCHOOL, just about all motors now are very narrow valve angle and steep intake port, the valve angle allows for higher compression(higher combustion pressure therfore higher output) with out having to ruin the flame front with huge valve cut outs and huge wedge on the piston to get comp ratio back up again.you will see when they went from silver 20v to black 20v they actually reduced the squish area, cam timing is very very similar and they put out more BHP.in forced induction motor squish is actually detrimental, how do I know this? many SR20 turbo motors on the dyno!!
also any one that says small port bigger than 20v or big port better is such and such a case if you read my first post properly (if you can read and comprehend technical that is) you will see better VE, better flow, better CE, higher BMEP for 5 valve, if you compare two motors and one has all those things better and rpm etc are equal then output MUST be higher, no argument!!
Jonny2t love ya thinking with regards to your valve timing locations you are spot on in your thinking vvt gives us the best of both worlds, and again you are right with regards to the Atlantic TRD parts!!!
CLG what do I want from a standard motor - MORE!! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42b99/42b992056024bc113ec9868de22cf4ea9ce63833" alt="Wink"
as for the usual FUKED responses like why don't george bush use a 20v if they are so good, how about the rotary engine? why isn't it used in sports car racing or f1, because regulations state it can't be used, why can't 5 valve be used in F1, get the FIA regs, maximum 4 valves!!! Why can't the NR750 motor be used in motorbike racing? I remember that one clearly(most of you guys probably were sitting around making a mess for your mums in ya nappies!!) but Honda bought out this trick oval piston 4 cyl motor, 8 valves per cyl, it was like a mini V8, two rods per cylinder, it didn't even get one race in, NEW RULE, one conrod per piston, overnight it banned it, so because that motor is not running in motorbike racing following some of your thoughts it must be a useless motor!!!!!FUK I love listening to experts, how old are some of you guys? early 20's, yeah sure is a lot of technical in your favourite tech mag, fast fours or something weak like that!!!get on an engine dyno and learn the truths!!
I have had bigport, small port 20v and gze on engine dyno and the results consistantly come up the same, I used 20v for my turbo motor knowing the VE was higher, higher VE = more torque, more torque = more power, end of story!
FUK I LOVE EXPERTS!!!
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Fri, 27 May 2005 12:54 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Big T | Fri, 27 May 2005 13:39 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 27 May 2005 14:49 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Fri, 27 May 2005 15:09 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Fri, 27 May 2005 15:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 00:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
CLG | Sat, 28 May 2005 01:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 01:42 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:16 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
floody | Tue, 31 May 2005 13:06 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:33 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Henn | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:46 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:05 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:07 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Acoustic | Tue, 31 May 2005 16:03 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:10 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:15 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:17 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
shinybluesteel | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
JFAllen | Sat, 28 May 2005 07:28 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:39 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:58 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 07:52 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 08:24 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
bored | Sat, 28 May 2005 10:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 10:08 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:24 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:19 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:32 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
bored | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:49 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:53 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
IRA11Y | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
ke382TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:50 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:59 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
ke382TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 12:37 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 13:58 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
boudan | Sat, 28 May 2005 15:22 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Acoustic | Tue, 31 May 2005 16:16 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
*rivmasta* | Wed, 01 June 2005 00:38 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Sun, 05 June 2005 09:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Sun, 05 June 2005 09:31 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 01:29 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Ben Wilson | Tue, 31 May 2005 00:03 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Joshstix | Sun, 29 May 2005 02:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 08:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
SEXY 16 | Sun, 29 May 2005 09:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
river | Sun, 29 May 2005 11:53 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:00 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:08 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:11 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Mr Revhead | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 29 May 2005 13:35 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
ROLLA GTi | Sun, 29 May 2005 13:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Sun, 29 May 2005 14:15 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 14:58 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
THE WITZL | Mon, 30 May 2005 02:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
funkdoc | Mon, 30 May 2005 11:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
4agte | Mon, 06 June 2005 08:18 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
floody | Mon, 06 June 2005 09:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
4agte | Mon, 06 June 2005 10:10 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
floody | Tue, 07 June 2005 04:13 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Mon, 30 May 2005 09:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Mon, 30 May 2005 09:18 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 10:36 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Mon, 30 May 2005 15:37 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Johnny | Mon, 30 May 2005 15:55 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 31 May 2005 02:07 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Tue, 31 May 2005 00:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Ben Wilson | Tue, 31 May 2005 01:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Tue, 31 May 2005 01:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 31 May 2005 07:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Tue, 31 May 2005 08:23 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Tue, 31 May 2005 11:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 11:56 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Merudo | Tue, 31 May 2005 11:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
xolent | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:17 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:25 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Tue, 31 May 2005 13:13 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
funkdoc | Wed, 01 June 2005 12:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Wed, 01 June 2005 14:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
emmac | Wed, 01 June 2005 14:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
rx-3 ip | Sat, 04 June 2005 06:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 05 June 2005 13:15 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 05 June 2005 13:47 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Kr0n1k | Sun, 05 June 2005 17:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 05 June 2005 22:28 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
EMP-2TG | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:50 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
jkvsnn | Tue, 07 June 2005 03:19 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 07 June 2005 03:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:44 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
SEXY 16 | Mon, 06 June 2005 01:00 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 06 June 2005 02:01 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Mon, 06 June 2005 02:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 06 June 2005 04:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
*rivmasta* | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:29 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
*rivmasta* | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:32 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 06 June 2005 08:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Mon, 06 June 2005 09:06 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
4agte | Mon, 06 June 2005 09:11 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Mon, 06 June 2005 11:38 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bobski | Mon, 06 June 2005 16:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Blown86 | Mon, 06 June 2005 23:30 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Corona RT142 | Mon, 06 June 2005 23:31 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
adamaw11 | Tue, 07 June 2005 01:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 07 June 2005 02:54 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
shinybluesteel | Tue, 07 June 2005 03:03 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
lumpy | Tue, 07 June 2005 05:52 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 01:50 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
TheStitt | Wed, 08 June 2005 06:24 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
510rob | Thu, 09 June 2005 19:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Fri, 10 June 2005 04:23 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 04:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Mr Revhead | Fri, 10 June 2005 05:49 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 06:21 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Mr Revhead | Fri, 10 June 2005 07:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 07:24 |
Current Time:
Mon Feb 24 17:02:43 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.011821985244751 seconds |