Author | Topic |
Location: Sydney
Registered: July 2002
|
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Sat, 28 May 2005 10:45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08f06/08f06b61beed2bfe3d7de66a6e3b8d431a6c88cc" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ee0/77ee018e1e3677253faa722e08a31e0d56c9dccf" alt="" |
What an interesting thread -- although there seems to be just a little to much pride and emotion for what should ultimately be a technical discussion.
A few thoughts...
There are other tradeoffs in the 4-valve vs. 5-valve argument which haven't been considered in this thread so far.
One of them would be valvetrain packaging and complexity. This is going to influence the design of most production engines considerably. Pointing to whether or not 5 valves are used by various manufacturers is only evidence of an overall cost/benefit decision by a manufacturer, and doesn't really tell you that much about the technical superiority of one design or another.
Think of all the pushrod engines still being manufactured for example. The manufacturer's choice to use one system over another is obviously not simply dictated by outright performance.
Another issue would be valvetrain mass. 5-valve engines might have an advantage when using regular cams due to lower valve mass. F1 engines have a different set of tradeoffs due to the use of exotic materials and pneumatic valve springs. If you change the valve material in your own car, you'll likely change this tradeoff as well.
Actually, there are even more problems with saying that because something is used in F1 it is the best. It just means that it's the best design to use when you are building a car with a massive budget to whichever rules the FIA gave you this year.
The discussions about flowbenching are also interesting, but probably more suitable for a different thread. I don't know too much about flowbenching, but from thinking about it it seems to have some inherent limitations.
A flowbench seems to generate a continuous vacuum, while a real engine is generating a pulsating vacuum. Clearly this will have different characteristics, as there will be resonance effects due to the mass of the intake charge. So simply comparing flow bench numbers for two different head designs is probably not enough to declare a clear winner. In fact, the tradeoff will be influenced by a lot of factors other than the number of valves... the valve timing, pulse frequency, port diameter, rod/stroke ratio... probably lots more. Engines are dynamic devices, which is what makes them so interesting.
Anyway, the point of this message is that the whole 5-valve vs. 4-valve war is a bit silly. Engineering is about tradeoffs, and what works in one situation might not work as well in another.
PS. Since when did age have anything to do with having a clue?
[Updated on: Sat, 28 May 2005 10:57]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Fri, 27 May 2005 12:54 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Big T | Fri, 27 May 2005 13:39 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 27 May 2005 14:49 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Fri, 27 May 2005 15:09 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Fri, 27 May 2005 15:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 00:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
CLG | Sat, 28 May 2005 01:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 01:42 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:16 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
floody | Tue, 31 May 2005 13:06 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:33 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Henn | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 05:46 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:05 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:07 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Acoustic | Tue, 31 May 2005 16:03 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:10 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:15 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:17 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
shinybluesteel | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
JFAllen | Sat, 28 May 2005 07:28 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:39 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 06:58 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 07:52 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 08:24 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
bored | Sat, 28 May 2005 10:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 10:08 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:24 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:19 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:32 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
bored | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:49 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:53 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
IRA11Y | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
ke382TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:50 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sat, 28 May 2005 11:59 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
ke382TG | Sat, 28 May 2005 12:37 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 28 May 2005 13:58 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
boudan | Sat, 28 May 2005 15:22 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Acoustic | Tue, 31 May 2005 16:16 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
*rivmasta* | Wed, 01 June 2005 00:38 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Sun, 05 June 2005 09:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Sun, 05 June 2005 09:31 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 01:29 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Ben Wilson | Tue, 31 May 2005 00:03 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Joshstix | Sun, 29 May 2005 02:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 08:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
SEXY 16 | Sun, 29 May 2005 09:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
river | Sun, 29 May 2005 11:53 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:00 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:08 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:11 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Mr Revhead | Sun, 29 May 2005 12:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 29 May 2005 13:35 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
ROLLA GTi | Sun, 29 May 2005 13:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Sun, 29 May 2005 14:15 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 29 May 2005 14:58 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
THE WITZL | Mon, 30 May 2005 02:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
funkdoc | Mon, 30 May 2005 11:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
4agte | Mon, 06 June 2005 08:18 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
floody | Mon, 06 June 2005 09:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
4agte | Mon, 06 June 2005 10:10 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
floody | Tue, 07 June 2005 04:13 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Mon, 30 May 2005 09:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Mon, 30 May 2005 09:18 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 10:36 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Mon, 30 May 2005 15:37 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Johnny | Mon, 30 May 2005 15:55 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 31 May 2005 02:07 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Tue, 31 May 2005 00:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Ben Wilson | Tue, 31 May 2005 01:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Tue, 31 May 2005 01:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 31 May 2005 07:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Jonny2TG | Tue, 31 May 2005 08:23 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Tue, 31 May 2005 11:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 11:56 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Merudo | Tue, 31 May 2005 11:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
xolent | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:17 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:25 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:43 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 31 May 2005 12:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Tue, 31 May 2005 13:13 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
funkdoc | Wed, 01 June 2005 12:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Wed, 01 June 2005 14:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
emmac | Wed, 01 June 2005 14:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
rx-3 ip | Sat, 04 June 2005 06:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 05 June 2005 13:15 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 05 June 2005 13:47 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Kr0n1k | Sun, 05 June 2005 17:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
170bhp | Sun, 05 June 2005 22:28 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
EMP-2TG | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:50 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
jkvsnn | Tue, 07 June 2005 03:19 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 07 June 2005 03:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Sun, 05 June 2005 23:44 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
SEXY 16 | Mon, 06 June 2005 01:00 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 06 June 2005 02:01 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
off-road | Mon, 06 June 2005 02:40 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 06 June 2005 04:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:04 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
*rivmasta* | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:29 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
*rivmasta* | Mon, 06 June 2005 07:32 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Mon, 06 June 2005 08:14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Mon, 06 June 2005 09:06 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
4agte | Mon, 06 June 2005 09:11 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Mon, 06 June 2005 11:38 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bobski | Mon, 06 June 2005 16:41 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Blown86 | Mon, 06 June 2005 23:30 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Corona RT142 | Mon, 06 June 2005 23:31 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
adamaw11 | Tue, 07 June 2005 01:26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Bill Sherwood | Tue, 07 June 2005 02:54 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
shinybluesteel | Tue, 07 June 2005 03:03 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
lumpy | Tue, 07 June 2005 05:52 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 01:50 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
TheStitt | Wed, 08 June 2005 06:24 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
510rob | Thu, 09 June 2005 19:48 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
takai | Fri, 10 June 2005 04:23 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 04:57 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Mr Revhead | Fri, 10 June 2005 05:49 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 06:21 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
Mr Revhead | Fri, 10 June 2005 07:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: Is 5 valve better than 4 valve?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 10 June 2005 07:24 |
Current Time:
Mon Feb 24 17:14:53 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.012340784072876 seconds |