Author | Topic |

Location: sunny coast, qld
Registered: October 2002
|
Re: sport compact classes
|
Tue, 31 May 2005 05:06

|
 |
my email:
Hi Jason,
I was actually referring to the Sport RWD class not the Pro RWD class.
I understand where you are coming from regarding the Pro class
however.
I just feel that because sport compact is primarily focused on import
cars that segmentation between smaller and larger six cylinders would
be beneficial considering that the majority of import engines are
smaller capacity.
I don't use an RB20 but I was using that as an example of how someone
would be severely disadvantaged if they were. In fact, I am not sure
if an R32 gts-t would be allowed to race because they wouldn't weigh
enough.
I am using a Toyota 1jz-gte in a Toyota Corona. This package has the
potential to match the best cars available in Sport RWD class. The
Corona was chosen, as it is one of the lightest cars the engine can be
put in and still be street legal. This was also done long before the
Sport Compact rules were formulated. The lack of capacity against
larger engines would have been offset by the lighter weight of the
vehicle. However, if my vehicle must weigh the same as a larger
capacity vehicle then I would be severely disadvantaged.
That is not my main issue though. The main issue being that a car
like mine (and there are many others) simply does not have a class to
compete in except the ET brackets.
I am not sure what the quickest times in Sport RWD are, but I was
looking for mid to high 10's out of my car, which I think would be
close to the front of the field except the GTR's. That is if, I am
able to compete.
On a final note, I saw a picture from a recent event held at WSID and
a car I know HYPO77, a 77-model Celica fitted with a 1jz-gte was
racing in Sport RWD. I am 99% sure that this car would not weigh the
required 3200lbs. Do you know how this would happen?
Thanks
Chris Davey
his email:
Hi Chris,
Once again thanks for the email, and more importantly good points that have
been made.
As you are aware of we recently dropped the minimum weights to better
reflect the Australian orientated cars. Previous weights were a direct cut
and shut from the US, and not all cars were adequately represented through
the weights here in Australia.
The new weights come into effect as of 1st of September 2005, and they are
as follows;
Sport RWD:
2 Rotor - 2300 pounds/ 1045kg
4 Cylinder RWD - 2300 pounds/ 1045kg
4 Cylinder 4WD - 2400 pounds/ 1090kg
6 Cylinder RWD - 3100 pounds/ 1409kg
6 Cylinder 4WD - 3200 pounds/ 1454kg
OLD WEIGHTS
RWD or 4WD 4-cylinder/2-rotor (1 power adder): 2,500 pounds,
RWD or 4WD 4-cylinder/2-rotor (2 power adders): 2,750 pounds,
RWD or 4WD 5-, 6-cylinder (1 power adder): 3,200 pounds,
RWD or 4WD 5-, 6-cylinder (2 power adders): 3,500 pounds
You can see we have slashed 100 pounds out of 6 RWD 1 power adder and a
whopping 400 pounds out of 6 RWD running 2 power adders!
As you can imagine it is impossible for us to cater for every engine/ car
configuration, and whilst I understand your plight, there is very little I
can do at this point in time. I suggest you contact you local ANDRA
Division Director, and get them involved.
They represent their respective racers, and are your voice on a national
level. A rule submission to alter an existing rule is not out of the
question, and they will guide you through the process.
I am extremely keen to encourage any potential; racer into the Sport Compact
fold, and make no mistake about it....I want you to race. There is
obviously a problem with your current vehicle and its weight, so I therefore
recommend you contact your local level ANDRA personnel and take matters
further.
I hope this helps in the mean time,
Jason O'Halloran
Doesn't look too good I don't think
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 07 April 2005 11:47 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
TE72_Turbo | Thu, 07 April 2005 12:17 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 07 April 2005 14:10 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Thu, 07 April 2005 23:44 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 11 April 2005 00:28 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Mon, 11 April 2005 02:56 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 11 April 2005 03:08 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Mon, 11 April 2005 03:30 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 11 April 2005 03:37 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Mon, 11 April 2005 04:09 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 11 April 2005 04:20 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Mon, 11 April 2005 05:13 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Mon, 11 April 2005 05:14 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 11 April 2005 05:27 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Mon, 11 April 2005 05:38 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 12 April 2005 00:33 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 12 April 2005 00:34 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
MS-75 | Thu, 14 April 2005 23:52 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Fri, 15 April 2005 06:55 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Wed, 20 April 2005 08:56 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Thu, 21 April 2005 02:08 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 21 April 2005 02:22 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Thu, 21 April 2005 02:48 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 21 April 2005 03:01 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Thu, 21 April 2005 03:36 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Thu, 21 April 2005 03:38 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 21 April 2005 03:43 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 21 April 2005 03:45 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Thu, 21 April 2005 03:53 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 21 April 2005 04:06 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Thu, 21 April 2005 04:17 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 03 May 2005 14:41 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
..J.. | Tue, 03 May 2005 23:45 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 31 May 2005 01:39 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
1JZ.747 | Tue, 31 May 2005 02:15 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 31 May 2005 04:01 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 31 May 2005 05:06 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
1JZ.747 | Tue, 31 May 2005 05:11 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 31 May 2005 05:23 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
1JZ.747 | Tue, 31 May 2005 05:31 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
MS-75 | Tue, 31 May 2005 06:30 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
1JZ.747 | Tue, 31 May 2005 06:44 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 31 May 2005 14:10 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
rob_RA40 | Tue, 31 May 2005 22:46 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Tue, 31 May 2005 23:26 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
rob_RA40 | Wed, 01 June 2005 00:06 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
EMP-2TG | Wed, 01 June 2005 00:18 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
rob_RA40 | Wed, 01 June 2005 00:25 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Wed, 01 June 2005 00:30 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Wed, 01 June 2005 02:37 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
1JZ.747 | Wed, 01 June 2005 02:43 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
1JZ.747 | Wed, 01 June 2005 02:45 |
 |
Re: sport compact classes
|
Chris Davey | Sat, 18 June 2005 01:01 |
Current Time:
Tue Mar 4 21:06:03 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0099749565124512 seconds |