| 
| Author | Topic | 
|---|
 
| 
 Location:
 Brisbane
 Registered:
 February 2003
 | 
	| Re: Apple goes Intel |  Wed, 08 June 2005 01:13    |  |  |  
	| actually, the G5 chips are IBM PowerPC chips - Apple went to IBM as motorolla couldn't deliver a fast and powerful enough chip. 
 i doubt there'll be much price reduction as the rest of the hardware (e.g. openfirmware based motherboard) will still be apple's unique design not a whitebox PC board from asus.
 
 My understanding of this is that it will give them faster laptops and more energy efficient chips - but there's no great erformace increase for workstations unless they run dual core CPUs in the dual CPU box (e.g. 4 x CPU for the real estate of two). lets not forget that the multi-core PowerPC 64 bits chips and Cell chipsets planned to come from IBM is very powereful hardware, it's a shame that we'll not see them in the Apple Xserves.
 
 There was a story on slashdot saying that the actual userbase (not just new purchasors) of Mac users could be as high as 16% in the desktop/laptop arena - i somehow doubt the high numbers but i think they're in for the long haul - i'm a big fan of them to (i work with Macintosh and we have 4 macs at home plus my mum is now an iBook devotee)
 
 but, if they get DTP/design software on linux to the level of quark/photoshop then i'l jump ship. sorry steve.
 
 cheers,
 Charles.
 |  |  |  |  
 
|  | Subject | Poster | Date | 
|---|
 
|  |    Apple goes Intel | river | Tue, 07 June 2005 21:40 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | Caledwvech | Wed, 08 June 2005 00:53 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | paulw85 | Wed, 08 June 2005 00:57 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | Caledwvech | Wed, 08 June 2005 01:02 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | thechuckster | Wed, 08 June 2005 01:13 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | MR. 2 | Wed, 08 June 2005 01:10 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | paulw85 | Wed, 08 June 2005 01:37 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | thechuckster | Wed, 08 June 2005 05:18 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | Caledwvech | Wed, 08 June 2005 01:41 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | paulw85 | Wed, 08 June 2005 10:19 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | thechuckster | Wed, 08 June 2005 13:22 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | unforgiven | Wed, 08 June 2005 10:54 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | paulw85 | Wed, 08 June 2005 21:53 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | river | Wed, 08 June 2005 22:00 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | paulw85 | Wed, 08 June 2005 22:09 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | Caledwvech | Wed, 08 June 2005 23:59 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | thechuckster | Thu, 09 June 2005 00:17 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | Caledwvech | Thu, 09 June 2005 00:34 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | RobST162 | Thu, 09 June 2005 00:43 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | toof | Sat, 11 June 2005 11:34 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | RobST162 | Sat, 11 June 2005 11:52 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | gearb0x | Sat, 11 June 2005 12:16 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | thechuckster | Sat, 11 June 2005 13:01 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | gearb0x | Sat, 11 June 2005 13:49 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | thechuckster | Sat, 11 June 2005 14:04 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | gearb0x | Sat, 11 June 2005 14:24 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | ae86drift | Sat, 11 June 2005 13:17 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | Ribfeast | Sun, 12 June 2005 23:09 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | thechuckster | Mon, 13 June 2005 01:01 |  
|  |    Re: Apple goes Intel | river | Tue, 14 June 2005 05:53 |  
 | Current Time: 
Fri Oct 31 21:21:58 UTC 2025 | 
 
  Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0051000118255615 seconds |