Author | Topic |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c99e9/c99e957b5d8090121031a7bbe3f7e08d95b047e9" alt=""
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: October 2004
|
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
Thu, 09 June 2005 07:12
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08f06/08f06b61beed2bfe3d7de66a6e3b8d431a6c88cc" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ee0/77ee018e1e3677253faa722e08a31e0d56c9dccf" alt="" |
changing from heavy duty lows from stock height heavy duty springs will not change anything but lower your car im going to assume.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
TRD-ST162 | Sun, 05 June 2005 04:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
September_Squall | Sun, 05 June 2005 11:42 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
-==L=a=N=c=E==- | Sun, 05 June 2005 12:06 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
StuC | Sun, 05 June 2005 12:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
TRD-ST162 | Sun, 05 June 2005 12:27 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
StuC | Mon, 06 June 2005 11:02 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
RWDboy | Tue, 07 June 2005 02:23 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
TRD-ST162 | Tue, 07 June 2005 11:22 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
RWDboy | Tue, 07 June 2005 12:49 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
Matt-itude | Tue, 07 June 2005 14:05 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
Classique71 | Wed, 08 June 2005 02:42 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
Cyber-punk | Wed, 08 June 2005 07:34 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
TRD-ST162 | Wed, 08 June 2005 08:36 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
Matt-itude | Thu, 09 June 2005 07:12 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/217f4/217f44bb2cded188bd3f327dd22bc903d94866df" alt="Read Message Read Message" |
Re: How would 268 degree cams run on a 3sge!
|
RWDboy | Thu, 09 June 2005 14:54 |