Author | Topic |
Location: Land of Oz
Registered: June 2004
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
Thu, 16 June 2005 07:28
|
|
Hi,
TRD_Supra wrote on Thu, 16 June 2005 12:37 | Real Basic, Visual Basic, they are pretty weak languages... use Java, i am studying that at uni and it sooo much more powerful than basic's eithe Java or C
|
Java is a fat slow pig and it generates bloated code and keeps the programmer blissfully ignorant of the true power of the hardware or the operating system. If you want to do pretty stuff with graphics and other non-powerhouse or speed-efficient stuff, then sure, Java is your man.
If you want tight fast and efficient code, then forget Java. Go for C in this case. If you want the ultimate in performance, tight code and power, then go for Assembler. If you want to write efficient code for device drivers or real-time interrupt driven executives then you use C or Assembler.
Java is the fully automatic, all-wheel drive, ABS, active suspension, 4cylinder peoplemover of the programming world. Yes, it will get you around in comfort without taxing your skills and if something goes wrong there's a lot of automation and other nicities to keep you sweet and safe.
It will do most of what you want in its leisurely and secure method, but don't kid yourself that Java is going to be able to successfully lock horns with some tight C or Assembler code for sheer performance and power.
As far as VB goes. It's on par for Java for girlyness, but I would think that complied VB code would be faster and tighter than an equivalent Java code. Hmmm.... I might have to check that out and do a few small programs to see what the executable size is.
seeyuzz
river
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
anyone here use REALbasic?
|
skellator | Tue, 14 June 2005 07:16 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
stradlater | Wed, 15 June 2005 07:32 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
skellator | Wed, 15 June 2005 07:45 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
RWDboy | Thu, 16 June 2005 01:41 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
thu187 | Thu, 16 June 2005 02:24 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
TRD_Supra | Thu, 16 June 2005 02:37 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
river | Thu, 16 June 2005 07:28 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
skellator | Thu, 16 June 2005 09:09 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
gearb0x | Thu, 16 June 2005 11:39 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
Norbie | Fri, 17 June 2005 05:19 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
ehendrikd | Fri, 17 June 2005 06:08 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
gearb0x | Mon, 20 June 2005 09:25 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
4DaDrift | Mon, 20 June 2005 20:10 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
RWDboy | Fri, 17 June 2005 15:25 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
EldarO | Fri, 17 June 2005 15:35 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
river | Sat, 18 June 2005 06:23 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
thu187 | Thu, 16 June 2005 03:21 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
skellator | Thu, 16 June 2005 06:00 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
Major Clod | Thu, 16 June 2005 06:54 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
unforgiven | Thu, 16 June 2005 07:08 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
EldarO | Thu, 16 June 2005 10:39 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
stradlater | Fri, 17 June 2005 07:15 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
RWDboy | Sat, 18 June 2005 01:03 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
Smokey228 | Sat, 18 June 2005 02:17 |
|
Re: anyone here use REALbasic?
|
skellator | Sat, 18 June 2005 03:49 |
Current Time:
Sun Feb 2 08:54:01 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0059988498687744 seconds |