F.A.Q.    Register    Login    Home Members    Search

Toymods » Tech & Conversions » SC vs Turbo -- Emissions Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls  Email to friend

Author	Topic
bored Occasional Poster Location: Sydney Registered: July 2002	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions Sun, 26 June 2005 05:50 4agte wrote on Sat, 25 June 2005 17:02 you are constantly boosting a s/c car when driving arround town to get away from traffic lights etc etc Unless you have a bypass valve, like most modern positive displacement superchargers do (look at eaton for example). Such superchargers do not require much power to run when the engine is not under load. [Report message to a moderator]

	Subject	Poster	Date
	SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	acreese	Fri, 24 June 2005 06:50
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	Henn	Fri, 24 June 2005 06:57
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	rob_RA40	Fri, 24 June 2005 07:00
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	acreese	Fri, 24 June 2005 07:24
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	mrshin	Sat, 25 June 2005 06:06
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	shinybluesteel	Sat, 25 June 2005 06:11
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	4agte	Sat, 25 June 2005 07:02
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	bored	Sun, 26 June 2005 05:50
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	4agte	Sun, 26 June 2005 07:16
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	acreese	Mon, 27 June 2005 01:26
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	inertia	Sun, 26 June 2005 06:20
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	Allan	Mon, 27 June 2005 02:05
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	Joshstix	Mon, 27 June 2005 02:23
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	Allan	Mon, 27 June 2005 02:30
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	Joshstix	Mon, 27 June 2005 02:50
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	Allan	Mon, 27 June 2005 02:52
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	Joshstix	Mon, 27 June 2005 03:15
	Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions	inertia	Mon, 27 June 2005 08:31

Previous Topic:	MZ20 running too rich?
Next Topic:	TROOPY TO DYNA - 4WD RUNNING GEAR same year? is it possible?????

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.