| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Adelaide
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
Mon, 20 January 2003 02:56
|
 |
| inferno wrote on Sun, 19 January 2003 22:43 |
But I don't see why people would still engineer their 2TG if it legally didn't need it!?!
|
Insurance perhaps? Regency are a pain in the arse. Having said that, I replaced my 5ME with a 5MGE without needing it being checked, however I have to pay more in insurance for the pleasure.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
3TGTE running NA
|
inferno | Wed, 15 January 2003 04:54 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
Norbie | Wed, 15 January 2003 05:47 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
CLG | Wed, 15 January 2003 11:06 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
inferno | Wed, 15 January 2003 13:30 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
Norbie | Thu, 16 January 2003 00:26 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
inferno | Thu, 16 January 2003 11:26 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
Norbie | Thu, 16 January 2003 13:37 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
E30-323ti | Thu, 16 January 2003 22:24 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
demuire | Fri, 17 January 2003 04:19 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
celicamad85 | Fri, 17 January 2003 04:26 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
thetoyman75 | Fri, 17 January 2003 04:37 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
inferno | Sat, 18 January 2003 00:58 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
thetoyman75 | Sat, 18 January 2003 02:18 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
Ollygt | Sun, 19 January 2003 11:11 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
inferno | Sun, 19 January 2003 12:13 |
|
Re: 3TGTE running NA
|
Roseboy | Mon, 20 January 2003 02:56 |
