Author | Topic |

Location: Sydney, OZ
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
Tue, 09 August 2005 23:58

|
 |
Quote: | Any idea where to look for the engine mounts?
|
Truefully, No, but ATM we're looking at trying to get a whole car here as they are a 2 door hatch... would look good parked next to the AE101 FXGT seca... Do a web search and best bet would be the US or find an import spare part place like castle Hill toyota here in sydney and see if they can get them. Then find a Front cut, there are a few starting to pop up now and remember that it is also a Celica engine too.
Quote: | And the passenger side top mount what do you do about it? make a custom one?
|
Modify or make one up, gut feeling would be to do the same as you would do for the 20V 6-spd.
Quote: | How strong are they?
|
They're a toyota, so it would be hard to kill!! Well the clubs current record for <1.8l N/A is 128kw@ wheels (which would be close to 180-190kw@flywheel!!) and this is a sportivo 2ZZGE. Running a low pressure turbo really wouldn't be too hard either see some of the sites in the states. What ever way, get some GZE twin spots or better on the front! Also consider that the AE102 is smaller/lighter than these too, so
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Tue, 09 August 2005 01:24 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
SW20R | Tue, 09 August 2005 01:47 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Tue, 09 August 2005 07:07 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
Johnny | Tue, 09 August 2005 11:34 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
Johnny | Tue, 09 August 2005 11:52 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Tue, 09 August 2005 12:48 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
Johnny | Tue, 09 August 2005 23:58 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
buckoc | Thu, 25 August 2005 04:13 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
emmac | Wed, 10 August 2005 04:12 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
Johnny | Wed, 10 August 2005 14:01 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
emmac | Wed, 10 August 2005 23:20 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
THE WITZL | Wed, 10 August 2005 02:06 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
Johnny | Wed, 10 August 2005 02:51 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
StuC | Wed, 10 August 2005 14:13 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Thu, 11 August 2005 05:14 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
Johnny | Thu, 11 August 2005 13:22 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Sat, 20 August 2005 11:19 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
THE WITZL | Sat, 20 August 2005 11:35 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Sat, 20 August 2005 11:58 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
THE WITZL | Sat, 20 August 2005 12:13 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Sat, 20 August 2005 23:30 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Mon, 22 August 2005 08:30 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
THE WITZL | Mon, 22 August 2005 08:47 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Mon, 22 August 2005 09:06 |
 |
Re: AE102 performance options?
|
birdie | Tue, 23 August 2005 00:06 |