Author | Topic |
Location: Sydney
Registered: April 2004
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
Thu, 11 August 2005 04:12
|
|
OKi....
What happened was that i did manage to get the car to idle properly with the Q45, however the Q45 is very sensitive to air disturbances . Initially the Q45 was located too close to the turbo, on my setup the pipe made from the turbo was made as far as possible, the swirl effect from the turbo was strong enough to distrupt the air.
What i ended up doing was taking the stock rubber pipe and using that as an extension to the Q45 to test it. Surprisingly enough the car idled without problems.
What i did was cut a bit of the bottom out where the airbox normally sits and run an extended pipe from the turbo down to just outside the engine bay (in the cavity where the SMIC use to sit) and attached the Q45 to it followed by a pod.
Im now getting pretty much air straight into the pod with no heat from the engine , just need to make sure the Q45 plug is sealed or taped properly incase water gets to it.
Occasionally the car may stall, usually if i come to a sudden stop it sometimes idles bad then stalls. But on normal driving its quiet good.
For those who are going to use the Q45 it is a very sensitive MOFO! , the Q45 was connected before without a pod and when you run your fingers across the surface of the Q45 you hear the idle change suddenly due to the disturbance that your finger makes to the air flow. Also for those who are heading this way, i suggest get an apexi super intake as that has a dual funnel affect which smooths out the air flow.
I am not sure how sensitive the Z32 is as i never tried it, but at this stage the Q45 is doing its job. The toyota stock AFM is good for around 220kw.
Alsternatively you can a piggy back ECU that utilises the map sensor, unfortunatly the power fc verison for the 1jz-gte vvti does not allow this.
I'll see if i have a pic of the setup...
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Mon, 23 May 2005 13:33 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
draven | Mon, 23 May 2005 13:57 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
E30-323ti | Mon, 23 May 2005 20:41 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Mon, 23 May 2005 22:42 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 24 May 2005 01:01 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Tue, 24 May 2005 01:07 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 24 May 2005 01:08 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
dojobi | Wed, 10 August 2005 14:33 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
jasonp1977 | Thu, 11 August 2005 03:30 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:12 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:15 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
dojobi | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:25 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:29 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
dojobi | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:23 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
CrUZsida | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:23 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:31 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
dojobi | Thu, 11 August 2005 04:43 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Thu, 11 August 2005 05:05 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 11 August 2005 05:13 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 11 August 2005 05:23 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
wilbo666 | Thu, 11 August 2005 05:59 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
CrUZsida | Thu, 11 August 2005 06:03 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
dojobi | Thu, 11 August 2005 06:09 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Fri, 12 August 2005 02:11 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
dojobi | Fri, 12 August 2005 02:19 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Fri, 12 August 2005 02:24 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
dojobi | Fri, 12 August 2005 02:26 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
soar | Fri, 12 August 2005 02:40 |
|
Re: Modify 1jz VVTI + AFM = ?!?
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 12 August 2005 02:54 |