| Author | Topic | 
|---|
|  
 Location:
 Newcastle
 Registered:
 June 2004
 | 
	| Re: Weight of ST162 |  Sun, 21 August 2005 07:05    |  |  |  
	| 1080   Mines 1240! 1080 sounds a bit light to me. Also there would be small differences between the ST and the SX.
 |  | 
|  | 
|  | Subject | Poster | Date | 
|---|
|  |    Weight of ST162 | Fiver | Sat, 20 August 2005 17:33 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | oldcorollas | Sat, 20 August 2005 17:49 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | Fiver | Sat, 20 August 2005 18:15 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | ST162GT-R | Sat, 20 August 2005 23:39 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | RWDboy | Sun, 21 August 2005 02:54 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | cycleofabuse | Sun, 21 August 2005 07:05 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | havabeer | Sun, 21 August 2005 07:42 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | Aust162 | Sun, 21 August 2005 07:56 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | oldcorollas | Sun, 21 August 2005 08:06 | 
|  |    Re: Weight of ST162 | FWDCelica | Sun, 21 August 2005 08:49 |