| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Adelaide / Tin Can Bay
Registered:
September 2005
|
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Sat, 10 September 2005 15:22
 
|
 |
OK I will have to look at it in more detail, I did some research and it looked like there were quite major changes for any of the twin cam engines, but if its easy to put an injected twin-cam in then that would be the way to go, if its not to expensive - though I suppose I could alway sell one of my kids 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Teddy_Csx | Sat, 10 September 2005 14:38 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:09 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:33 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sun, 11 September 2005 02:10 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 12:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:30 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:46 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:23 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:32 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:49 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 11:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:37 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:43 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:44 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:57 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 16:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:28 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:52 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:24 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:31 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:12 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Mon, 12 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
EldarO | Mon, 12 September 2005 16:51 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:59 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 12:26 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:02 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 15:16 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 06 October 2005 22:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Fri, 07 October 2005 03:03 |
