| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Adelaide / Tin Can Bay
Registered:
September 2005
|
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Sun, 11 September 2005 16:15
 
|
 |
Well as I'm still concerned about how much I need to do to get a twin cam into the 70 I would happily look at the idea of a SOHC on the same mounts and bell as the 70.
My son has an Hundi 1500 SOHC injected and it goes up the hill very well on half the fuel, it is much lighter though if you lean on it with your elbow it dents and thats on the door pillars thats strongest panel.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Teddy_Csx | Sat, 10 September 2005 14:38 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:09 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:33 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sun, 11 September 2005 02:10 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 12:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:30 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:46 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:23 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:32 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:49 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 11:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:37 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:43 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:44 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:57 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 16:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:28 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:52 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:24 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:31 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:12 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Mon, 12 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
EldarO | Mon, 12 September 2005 16:51 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:59 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 12:26 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:02 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 15:16 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 06 October 2005 22:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Fri, 07 October 2005 03:03 |
