| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Adelaide / Tin Can Bay
Registered:
September 2005
|
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Mon, 12 September 2005 09:42
 
|
 |
Advice accepted, I like the Idea of just fitting EFI, and Elec ignition, I don't need much more power and it seems to me that this would do the tric. Fuel injection is so much more efficient.
What is required to fit EFI to my excising K4 it is so good in every other respect I would rather not chance to an engine thats done big Ky's.
THX
J
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Teddy_Csx | Sat, 10 September 2005 14:38 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:09 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:33 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sun, 11 September 2005 02:10 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 12:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:30 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:46 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:23 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:32 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:49 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 11:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:37 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:43 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:44 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:57 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 16:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:28 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:52 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:24 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:31 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:12 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Mon, 12 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
EldarO | Mon, 12 September 2005 16:51 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:59 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 12:26 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:02 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 15:16 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 06 October 2005 22:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Fri, 07 October 2005 03:03 |
