Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au
F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Members Members    Search Search
Toymods » Tech & Conversions » More efficent KE70 would be nice

Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls 
Email to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
oldcorollas
Forums Junkie


Location:
Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered:
January 2003
 
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice Mon, 12 September 2005 11:12 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
jeffm wrote on Mon, 12 September 2005 19:42

Advice accepted, I like the Idea of just fitting EFI, and Elec ignition, I don't need much more power and it seems to me that this would do the tric. Fuel injection is so much more efficient.
What is required to fit EFI to my excising K4 it is so good in every other respect I would rather not chance to an engine thats done big Ky's.
THX
J


the EFI starlets (82-83ish models in US) go nicely with stock 4K and EFI.

you need.
4KE or 7KE manifold, injectors, throttle body, fuel rail, pressure reg, damper.. the usual.
EFI fuel pump. internal one adapted from AE82 or similar would probably work.
use existing METAL fuel lines, change rubber to EFI rated.
Megasquirt ECU (DIY type EFI ECU, please google and understand what you are getting into)
a couple of camira temp sensors
EGO sensor.
thats about it.

and it is a 4K.... not a K4.... thats why the block has 4K stamped on it....

unless you actually have a K motor which would be a bit weird.
  Send a private message to this user    

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSat, 10 September 2005 13:22
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice mrshinSat, 10 September 2005 13:27
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice Teddy_CsxSat, 10 September 2005 14:38
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSat, 10 September 2005 15:00
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice mrshinSat, 10 September 2005 15:09
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSat, 10 September 2005 15:22
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice mrshinSat, 10 September 2005 15:27
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSat, 10 September 2005 15:33
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice mrshinSun, 11 September 2005 02:10
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 12:19
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice oldcorollasSun, 11 September 2005 13:47
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 13:55
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice takaiSun, 11 September 2005 14:19
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 14:30
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice takaiSun, 11 September 2005 14:35
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 14:46
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice takaiSun, 11 September 2005 14:55
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 15:06
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice takaiSun, 11 September 2005 15:14
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 15:23
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice takaiSun, 11 September 2005 15:32
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 15:42
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice oldcorollasSun, 11 September 2005 15:49
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmTue, 13 September 2005 11:45
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice oldcorollasTue, 13 September 2005 12:37
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmTue, 13 September 2005 12:43
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice takaiSun, 11 September 2005 15:44
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 15:57
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmSun, 11 September 2005 16:15
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice oldcorollasMon, 12 September 2005 08:28
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice takaiSun, 11 September 2005 15:52
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice Pure_In_SanityMon, 12 September 2005 08:15
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice oldcorollasMon, 12 September 2005 08:24
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice Pure_In_SanityMon, 12 September 2005 11:06
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmMon, 12 September 2005 09:31
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmMon, 12 September 2005 09:42
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice  oldcorollasMon, 12 September 2005 11:12
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice mrshinMon, 12 September 2005 14:35
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice EldarOMon, 12 September 2005 16:51
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmTue, 13 September 2005 15:00
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice oldcorollasTue, 13 September 2005 15:14
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmTue, 13 September 2005 15:59
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmThu, 06 October 2005 12:26
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice PhrostbyteThu, 06 October 2005 14:02
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice jeffmThu, 06 October 2005 14:47
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice PhrostbyteThu, 06 October 2005 15:16
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice Chris DaveyThu, 06 October 2005 22:45
Read Message   Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice PhrostbyteFri, 07 October 2005 03:03
Previous Topic:POWERSTEERING ARMSZ
Next Topic:do surbaru liberty wheels fit a 97 celica sx?

Goto Forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Wed Jan 22 13:08:53 UTC 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0045981407165527 seconds

Bandwidth utilization bar

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.