| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
Tue, 13 September 2005 00:44
 
|
 |
| justcallmefrank wrote on Tue, 13 September 2005 10:24 |
| KOFFEE-BLACK wrote on Mon, 12 September 2005 20:17 |
I have the IS200, which had the 6 speed, it was no where near as tight as a w58 or v160, very loose, and is not as strong as a 58
|
On the contrary, everyone I've spoken to has raved about how nice the J160 is to use. Who said it's not as strong either, how can you quantify that? Sure, someone broke it with *only* 200rwkw, but plenty of people have done the same to W58's.
|
I think the torque, is the main killer for gearboxes. A 1J produces alot more torque than the 1GFE, reasons for swapping to a w58. Having that said, I havnt heard of any breaking, even with the Altezza drift club in Japan, most blow the diff before the box.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
The Count | Mon, 12 September 2005 01:57 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 12 September 2005 03:21 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
Chris Davey | Mon, 12 September 2005 05:52 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
Alchemist | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:51 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Mon, 12 September 2005 12:17 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 13 September 2005 00:24 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Tue, 13 September 2005 00:44 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 13 September 2005 01:21 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
BlackSupra | Mon, 12 September 2005 12:19 |
|
Re: supra 6spd vs IS200 6spd
|
gianttomato | Mon, 12 September 2005 20:01 |
