| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Tue, 13 September 2005 12:37
 
|
 |
on the earlier KE models, they have a much taller air cleaner, the KE70 one is maybe 1/2 the height (but larger diameter).
on KE10's to KE70's, removing the lid, or cutting away the sides always makes running at highspeed much much better...
and louder... much louder 
xK powered vans have a hat on top of the carby to duct air in from a remote air cleaner.. you could use something simple like that to go to even a VN commondore airbox ($30-40 new) or any you have lyign around...
i used chikcken wire and duct tape, and later moved "up" to PVC.. worked nicely
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 13:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Teddy_Csx | Sat, 10 September 2005 14:38 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:09 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:22 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:27 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sat, 10 September 2005 15:33 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Sun, 11 September 2005 02:10 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 12:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 13:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:19 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:30 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:46 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 14:55 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:23 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:32 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:49 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 11:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:37 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 12:43 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:44 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:57 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Sun, 11 September 2005 16:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:28 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
takai | Sun, 11 September 2005 15:52 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:15 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 08:24 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Pure_In_Sanity | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:06 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:31 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Mon, 12 September 2005 09:42 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 12 September 2005 11:12 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
mrshin | Mon, 12 September 2005 14:35 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
EldarO | Mon, 12 September 2005 16:51 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:00 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
oldcorollas | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:14 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Tue, 13 September 2005 15:59 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 12:26 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:02 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
jeffm | Thu, 06 October 2005 14:47 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Thu, 06 October 2005 15:16 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Chris Davey | Thu, 06 October 2005 22:45 |
|
Re: More efficent KE70 would be nice
|
Phrostbyte | Fri, 07 October 2005 03:03 |
