Author | Topic |
Location: Heathmont, Melbourne, Vic
Registered: May 2004
|
Re: defect notice
|
Fri, 23 September 2005 21:59
|
|
Clown wrote on Sat, 24 September 2005 04:22 | point 3 is wrong, its under permit conditions after the 7 days in victoria. Point 6 is also wrong, i was told i could drive the car whenever i wanted aslong as i changed tyres, i could even drive car in wet if i changed tyres. I got defected a few months back for having all 4 tyres bald (which was in correct the back tyres were perfectly legal (just) and the front tyres, well they were down on the insides). I copped a 170$ fine for "driving a car that failed to comply with rwc requirements", although i didn't need a RWC just had to put legal tyres on. Borrow a mates rims and went into clear it to find out that there was no record of it on the system.
|
I can assure you that you were incorrectly informed. Unfortunately not all members have the same standards when conducting Road Worth checks. Who checked your vehicle, was it the local van or a Traffic Management Unit? People on the van aren't usually too strict on NOR's because its not there bread and butter.
7 days is the maximum time BY LAW.
It sounds like your were just issued with a formal warning (which is a very rare thing, so consider yourself lucky).
If you don't believe me then contact Vehicle Safety Testing School, located at 20 Dawson Street, Brunswick, or your local Traffic Management Unit (the unit that has the SS's and XR8's).
Remember this is for Victoria - other states probably vary.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
defect notice
|
supré-mkii | Thu, 08 September 2005 23:21 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
SW20R | Fri, 09 September 2005 01:13 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
supré-mkii | Thu, 15 September 2005 02:27 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
berad | Thu, 15 September 2005 05:49 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
supré-mkii | Thu, 15 September 2005 12:49 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
ta23 | Thu, 15 September 2005 13:32 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
berad | Fri, 16 September 2005 01:54 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
supré-mkii | Wed, 21 September 2005 10:21 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
-=DV=- | Wed, 21 September 2005 10:39 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
-=DV=- | Wed, 21 September 2005 10:41 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
filthman | Thu, 22 September 2005 18:09 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
Clown | Fri, 23 September 2005 18:22 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
oldcorollas | Fri, 23 September 2005 19:12 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
supré-mkii | Mon, 26 September 2005 04:04 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
filthman | Fri, 23 September 2005 21:59 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
Clown | Sat, 24 September 2005 07:08 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
Jorrs | Fri, 23 September 2005 01:22 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
filthman | Fri, 23 September 2005 03:07 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
DeViL rOlLa | Fri, 23 September 2005 11:11 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
Jorrs | Fri, 23 September 2005 14:30 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
EldarO | Sat, 24 September 2005 09:49 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
filthman | Sat, 24 September 2005 22:59 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
Clown | Sun, 25 September 2005 05:11 |
|
Re: defect notice
|
filthman | Sun, 25 September 2005 22:23 |
Current Time:
Thu Jan 9 14:06:24 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0065181255340576 seconds |